1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
kicyunya [14]
3 years ago
5

After a moderate Supreme Court justice retires, a Democratic president near the end of his second term nominates a new justice w

ith a moderate background. The Republican Senate majority leader blocks the nomination until the end of the congressional session. A newly elected Republican president nominates a conservative judge to the position. This nominee is confirmed by the Republican-majority Senate. During the first term, the new justice sides with other conservative justices to render several 5–4 opinions. What does this scenario reveal about the implications of replacing a Supreme Court justice? Justices must take neutral positions and not let their ideology influence court decisions. Justices’ decisions will always match the party ideology of the president who nominated them. A new justice must maintain the balance of ideology and make decisions consistent with the retiring justice’s views. A justice with different ideology from a retiring justice may cause the court to lean a particular direction for decades.
Advanced Placement (AP)
1 answer:
aleksandrvk [35]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

The justice system will be divided

Explanation:

when a republic senate majority leader stops a new Supreme Court Justice from obtaining that seat due to a president ( that's a democratic),verses a republic president is opinionated, as well as divided when it comes to the same values of American. I feel like regardless of who is seated for

You might be interested in
I need help on this question please
Delicious77 [7]

Answer:

d i think

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
What impact does gerrymandering have on a democracy?
olga55 [171]

Answer:

Two principal tactics are used in gerrymandering: "cracking" (i.e. diluting the voting power of the opposing party's supporters across many districts) and "packing" (concentrating the opposing party's voting power in one district to reduce their voting power in other districts).  Gerrymandering means to draw congressional districts to the advantage of the political party that controls the State's legislature. This is a tactic that does not give equal representation to minority groups in the Congress.

Explanation:

hope this helps :D pls mark brainliest :D

4 0
3 years ago
Which of the following countries was NOT
Furkat [3]
I believe the answer is Vietnam
3 0
3 years ago
PLEASEEE SOMEONE HELP ME, EXPLAIN what to do here, i'm confused still because of language problem. i really appreciate it. :,)))
motikmotik
Okay, think of an essay or paragraph as like stating your opinion. Here’s how to break it down so it’s a little easier:

Paragraph 1 - Introduction.
Provide background information on the topic. Give about 1-2 sentences on what the topic is about, and for the 3rd sentence, put in a statement that IS your argument.
For example, “French fries are the best food ever because they are delicious.”

Paragraph 2 - Conflict.
Elaborate on your argument/thesis statement. Since that seems to be your conflict, describe something hard you’ve been through. What was hard about it? How did it affect you?

Paragraph 3 - Response
Elaborate more on how the conflict affected you personally. If you can, try to connect it to a bigger picture or theme.
For example, “I broke my leg in middle school as a result of a basketball injury. Therefore, we should eliminate school sports because they cause injuries.”
It’s a reach, but that’s the entire point of connecting to a bigger theme.

Paragraph 4 - Explain Response
Here is where you’re going to connect your response in paragraph 3 to a bigger picture. Talk about the outcome and effect you showed in paragraph 3.

The questions mentioned should help you- break it down in a way that you understand. I tried to simplify this for you in the easiest way possible, I hope it helps and good luck :)
5 0
3 years ago
Which of the following terms is not considered a negative effect of stigmatizing?
dangina [55]

Answer:

B. self-fulfilling prophecies

Explanation:

  • Self-fulfilling prophecies are not considered a negative effect of stigmatizing.
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Describe one source of renewable energy....Please explain it why would you pick the source, can it be used over the world..Ex
    9·1 answer
  • Economic development results in low agricultural density because
    6·2 answers
  • A jet is moving horizontally with a constant velocity of 305 m/s at an altitude of 730m. It drops its payload.
    12·1 answer
  • Explain the causes and effects of economic strategies of different states and empires
    6·1 answer
  • What are the OSHA violation types?
    13·1 answer
  • Why has globalization been increasing so drastically in the
    5·1 answer
  • Explain ONE reason the Gunpowder Empires rose during the period 1450-1750.
    9·1 answer
  • Lines, which make loops in the center and lines with unconnected ends at the edge have arrows indicating clockwise motion. A is
    6·2 answers
  • Any cu.te gi.rl here who wanna join me.e t​
    13·2 answers
  • Penny has a group of friends who are really smart with computers. They claim they have a fool proof way to access questions to t
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!