Answer:
True
Explanation:
The variables price and quantity are inverse correlated then a change in 1 has the exact opposite effect in the other.
Family planning is the major point so as to reduce birth rate in the country immigration and emigration
Answer:
30.000
Explanation:
Income before taxes $300,000
Timing difference between books and Tax (A)
$100,000
Permanent difference cannot be considered for calculation of Differed tax liability or Deferred tax asset $40,000 (B) is zero
Total Timing deference (C=A+B) $100,000
Tax rate enacted for future (D) 30%
<h2>
Differed tax liability (C*D) $30,000
</h2>
<h2>
</h2>
Answer:
a. -$783 Unfavorable
b. 550 Favorable
Explanation:
a. The computation of Variable Overhead Rate Variance is shown below:-
Variable Overhead Rate Variance = Actual hours × (Standard Variable Overhead rate per hour - Actual Variable Overhead rate per hour)
= 8,700 × ($4.10 - ($36,540 ÷ 8,700)
= 8,700 × ($4.10 - $4.19)
= 8,700 × -$0.09
= -$783 Unfavorable
b. The computation of Variable Overhead Efficiency Variance is shown below:-
Variable Overhead Efficiency Variance = Standard Variable Overhead Rate per Hour × (Standard Hours for Actual Production - Actual Hours)
= 5.5 × ((5.5 × 1,600) - 8,700)
= 5.5 × (8,800 - 8,700)
= 5.5 × 100
= 550 Favorable
Answer:
No, because the second method has lower total costs of production.
Explanation:
In a bid to make profits businesses must always compare different processes and choose the cheapest one.
This will eventually reflect in the profitability of the business.
In this instance let's get the cost of each process.
Fabric costs $110 a bolt and labor costs $20 an hour.
The first dress maker can sew 400 garments with 100 bolts of fabric and 1,500 hours of labour
Total cost = (100 bolts * 110) + (1500 * 20)
Total cost = $41,000
For the second dress maker he can sew 400 garments with 150 bolts of fabric and 1,000 hours of identical labour
Total cost = (150 *110) + (1000 * 20)
Total cost = $36,500
As can be seen the second dressmaker has a lower cost of production so he is more efficient than the first dress maker
