D- "you can't help it if you get one" is NOT true as there are various methods to keep from getting one.
Consumers lack an efficient method for assessing the negative consequences that the production and use of these goods and services have on their own health as well as the planet's life-support systems.
The firm benefits, but the environment does not, from the exclusion of environmental and health expenses from the production of goods and services. For instance, a timber business will pay to take down trees but not for habitat destruction or replanting.
Government assistance, resource consumption, and environmental damage are all related. The government provides tax advantages or subsidies to businesses so they may utilize those funds to operate. In turn, this leads to the creation of jobs, which boosts economies. On the other hand, it leads to the destruction and depletion of natural capital.
Here is another question with an answer similar to this about environmental problems: brainly.com/question/10820529
#SPJ4
It is actually quite hard to decide. I guess you could say barrier methods could be considered more reliable, due to the fact that they physically stop conception (for example, a condom physically stops any sperm from reaching the egg) compared to hormonal methods, which rely on hormones to trigger certain responses in the body that prevent pregnancy, but hormonal methods, such as the oral contraceptive pill, have been reported to have a high success rate. However, hormonal methods have been known to have different side effects due to the sudden change in hormones in the body, and may not be as effective on each person due to every person's hormone balance to be different. Also, certain barrier methods (eg. condoms) help to prevent the spread of STIs/STDs, which hormonal methods do not do.
That would be <span>D. emotions
</span>
Answer:
Get an EKG and consider putting an order in for a consultation with a physical therapist
Explanation:
The question is incomplete so you can't rule out MI but it may just be MSK overuse injury that can be treated with PT
