The main reason that Wegener's hypothesis was not accepted was because he suggested no mechanism for moving the continents. He thought the force of Earth's spin was sufficient to cause continents to move, but geologists knew that rocks are too strong for this to be true. Alfred Wegener (1880-1930) Except for a few converts, and those like Cloos who couldn't accept the concept but was clearly fascinated by it, the international geological community's reaction to Wegener's theory was militantly hostile. American geologist Frank Taylor had published a similar theory in 1910, but most of his colleagues had simply ignored it. Wegener's more cogent and comprehensive work, however, was impossible to ignore and ignited a firestorm of rage and rancor. Moreover, most of the blistering attacks were aimed at Wegener himself, an outsider who seemed to be attacking the very foundations of geology. Because of this abuse,Wegener could not get a professorship at any German university. Fortunately, the University of Graz in Austria was more tolerant of controversy, and in 1924 it appointed him professor of meteorology and geophysics.
In 1926 Wegener was invited to an international symposium in New York called to discuss his theory. Though he found some supporters, many speakers were sarcastic to the point of insult. Wegener said little. He just sat smoking his pipe and listening. His attitude seems to have mirrored that of Galileo who, forced to recant Copernicus' theory that the Earth moves around the sun, is said to have murmured, "Nevertheless, it moves!"
Scientifically, of course, Wegener's case was not as good as Galileo's, which was based on mathematics. His major problem was finding a force or forces that could make the continents "plow around in the mantle," as one critic put it. Wegener tentatively suggested two candidates: centrifugal force caused by the rotation of the Earth, and tidal-type waves in the Earth itself generated by the gravitational pull of the sun and moon.
He realized these forces were inadequate. "It is probable the complete solution of the problem of the forces will be a long time coming," he predicted in his last (1929) revision. "The Newton of drift theory has not yet appeared."
Wegener noted, however, that one thing was certain:
The forces which displace continents are the same as those which produce great fold-mountain ranges. Continental drift, faults and compressions, earthquakes, volcanicity, [ocean] transgression cycles and [apparent] polar wandering are undoubtedly connected on a grand scale. Wegener's final revison cited supporting evidence from many fields, including testimonials from scientists who found his hypothesis resolved difficulties in their disciplines much better than the old theories. Climatology was one such discipline.
The main reason that Wegener's hypothesis was not accepted was because he suggested no mechanism for moving the continents. He thought the force of Earth's spin was sufficient to cause continents to move, but geologists knew that rocks are too strong for this to be true.
wikipedia says: "The Connecticut Compromise (also known as the Great Compromise of 1787 or Sherman Compromise) was an agreement that large and small states reached during the Constitutional Convention of 1787 that in part defined the legislative structure and representation that each state would have under the United States Constitution. It retained the bicameral legislature as proposed by Roger Sherman, along with proportional representation of the states in the lower house or House of Representatives, but required the upper house or Senate to be weighted equally among the states. Each state would have two representatives in the upper house."
One of the goals of the <u>a) Causal</u> research is to understand the influence of the independent <u>variables</u> on the dependent <u>variable</u>.
<h3>What is causal research?</h3>
Unlike descriptive research, which describes what is going on or what exists, causal research or “experimental study” is designed to determine whether one or more variables (independent variables) cause or affect the value of another variable (dependent variable).
An independent variable is a variable that the researcher changes to determine the dependent variable.
<h3>Answer Options</h3>
a) Causal research
b) Probability sampling
c) Descriptive research
d) Exploratory research
e) Nonprobability sampling
Thus, one of the goals of the <u>a) Causal</u> research is to understand the influence of the independent <u>variables</u> on the dependent <u>variable</u>.
Based on a 2017 Gallup poll, 41 percent of Texans identified as being Republican or leaning Republican, while 38 percent of Texans identified as being Democratic or leaning Democratic. This is further explained below.
<h3>What is the 2017 Gallup poll?</h3>
Generally, Gallup's World Poll provides systematic tracking and reporting on topics such as happiness, leadership approval, and trust in national institutions.
In conclusion, The 2017 Gallup survey found that 41% of Texans identified as Republicans or Republicans-leaning, while 38% identified as Democrats or Democrats-leaning.
While some of a culture's knowledge, rules, beliefs, values, fears, and anxieties are taught explicitly, most of the information is absorbed subconsciously.
Communicating across cultures is challenging because knowledge of cultures is essential for facilitating interaction with people. Language has always been an important source of communication. Moreover, language plays an important role when you want to express your opinions and attitudes to the person you are talking to and for that, it is essential to learn the local language for effective communication.