The main reason that Wegener's hypothesis was not accepted was because he suggested no mechanism for moving the continents. He thought the force of Earth's spin was sufficient to cause continents to move, but geologists knew that rocks are too strong for this to be true. Alfred Wegener (1880-1930) Except for a few converts, and those like Cloos who couldn't accept the concept but was clearly fascinated by it, the international geological community's reaction to Wegener's theory was militantly hostile. American geologist Frank Taylor had published a similar theory in 1910, but most of his colleagues had simply ignored it. Wegener's more cogent and comprehensive work, however, was impossible to ignore and ignited a firestorm of rage and rancor. Moreover, most of the blistering attacks were aimed at Wegener himself, an outsider who seemed to be attacking the very foundations of geology. Because of this abuse,Wegener could not get a professorship at any German university. Fortunately, the University of Graz in Austria was more tolerant of controversy, and in 1924 it appointed him professor of meteorology and geophysics.
In 1926 Wegener was invited to an international symposium in New York called to discuss his theory. Though he found some supporters, many speakers were sarcastic to the point of insult. Wegener said little. He just sat smoking his pipe and listening. His attitude seems to have mirrored that of Galileo who, forced to recant Copernicus' theory that the Earth moves around the sun, is said to have murmured, "Nevertheless, it moves!"
Scientifically, of course, Wegener's case was not as good as Galileo's, which was based on mathematics. His major problem was finding a force or forces that could make the continents "plow around in the mantle," as one critic put it. Wegener tentatively suggested two candidates: centrifugal force caused by the rotation of the Earth, and tidal-type waves in the Earth itself generated by the gravitational pull of the sun and moon.
He realized these forces were inadequate. "It is probable the complete solution of the problem of the forces will be a long time coming," he predicted in his last (1929) revision. "The Newton of drift theory has not yet appeared."
Wegener noted, however, that one thing was certain:
The forces which displace continents are the same as those which produce great fold-mountain ranges. Continental drift, faults and compressions, earthquakes, volcanicity, [ocean] transgression cycles and [apparent] polar wandering are undoubtedly connected on a grand scale. Wegener's final revison cited supporting evidence from many fields, including testimonials from scientists who found his hypothesis resolved difficulties in their disciplines much better than the old theories. Climatology was one such discipline.
The main reason that Wegener's hypothesis was not accepted was because he suggested no mechanism for moving the continents. He thought the force of Earth's spin was sufficient to cause continents to move, but geologists knew that rocks are too strong for this to be true.
Risk is the potential for uncontrolled loss of something of value, it can also be defined as the intentional interaction with uncertainty. In this context, risk is the probability that a certain percentage of employees will take advantage of benefit plan that will be proposed by the human resources manager that is the manager is risking the loss or mis use of the business plan.
A is wrong because Loyalists were the colonists loyal to the British.
B is wrong because it is an expression used for the people who are members of Parliament.
C is wrong because Tories are the the members of political party in Britain.
D is correct because Patriots were named like that be cause they were fighting for the patriotic cause and that was the independence of the colonies from the British Crown.
Linguistic determinism hypothesis: The linguistic determinism hypothesis is also referred to as Sapir-Whorf hypothesis, and is defined as the concept that a particular language and language's structures limit & explain or determine human thought or knowledge and thought processes including memory, perception, and categorization. In short, it determines that people speaking different languages possess different though processes.
Example: An individual living in mountain areas usually describe the place in many words but who doesn't live there might describe the place in one or two words.
A perceptual set has to do with how an individual is predisposed to perceive things in a unique way. Sometimes when an object or circumstance is presented to several people, they most likely only notice certain attributes of the object or circumstance while ignoring some other attributes, this most times as a result of how they perceive things. A perceptual set can also be referred to as how a person interprets certain things based on the person's previous experiences. In addition, in the face of new information, one's culture, expectations, experiences can implicate one's ability to see certain things while ignoring others.
