He might wanna move to new york and become a city boy
Answer:
CHANGES INCLUDE: Urbanization, automated machines, change in women's life.
CONTINUOUS Activities: same raw materials, use of human labor to complement machines
Explanation:
The industrial revolution brought about a lot of changes in Europe between the period of 1740-1941 which lead to changes in political, social, and economical.
The changes that occur during the industrial revolution are:
The industrial revolution also brought about urbanization as a form of change.
Production was done in an automated manner with the use of machines instead of manual labor.
The manufacturing and the production made possible by a steam engine with steam power looms
Women's life changed during this period because the industrial revolution makes them work outside of the home unlike when they were full housewives.
Women also develop and know more about their suffrage rights due to the industrial revolution.
However, some of the other things that remain the same or continues include:
The continuous use of labor to complement the machine
The materials used in production remain the same. An example is the cotton materials that were used before the advent of industrialization is still the same being use with the machines.
Mahatma Gandhi had an impact on Nehru’s nationalistic feelings.
<u>Explanation:</u>
Jawahar Lal Nehru was one of the major leaders who fought for the independence of India from the rule of the British. He was the first prime minister of India when India got independence and served as the same till 1964.
He was highly influenced by the way of Mahatma Gandhi fighting for the same reason. Because of the contributions made by him for the development of the country, he is also known as the architect of India by Amar Chitra.
Federalism is the system of government in which power is divided between a central government and regional governments; in the United States, both the national government and the state governments possess a large measure of sovereignty.
Answer:
The Supreme Court decision that decided the 2000 Presidential Election should go down in history as one of the court's most ill-conceived judgments. In issuing its poorly-reasoned ruling in Bush v. Gore, the court majority unnecessarily exposed itself to charges of partisanship and risked undermining the court's stature as an independent, impartial arbiter of the law. Although the court majority correctly identified constitutional problems in the specific recount proceedings ordered by the Florida Supreme Court, the decision to end all recount attempts did immeasurable damage to the equal protection rights the court claimed to be guarding, since it favored a convenient and timely tabulation of ballots over an accurate recording of the vote. In the controversy that followed this decision, some critics of the majority decision argued that the court had no business taking on Bush v. Gore in the first place, that it should have remained solely within the Florida courts (Ginsburg, J. [Dissent] Bush v. Gore [2000]). This paper will argue that the court was correct to intervene but that umm the resulting decision was flawed and inconsistent, with potentially serious, adverse implications for the Federal judiciary if the court continues to issue rulings in this way.
Explanation:
