1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
katrin2010 [14]
3 years ago
10

How did the Hundred Year’s War threaten the stability of medieval society?

History
1 answer:
Andrej [43]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

The loss of all English-held territory in France except Calais. A high number of casualties amongst the nobility, particularly in France. A decline in trade, especially English wool and Gascon wine. A great wave of taxes to pay for the war which contributed to social unrest in both countries.

Explanation:

Hope it helps!

You might be interested in
Social policies are rules or guidelines designed to achieve reasonable outcomes for members of society, regardless of their grou
nevsk [136]

Answer: D. Goods and Resources

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was one effect of the french and indian war on great britain's american colonies?
miss Akunina [59]

Answer:

The French and Indian War began in 1754 and ended with the Treaty of Paris in 1763. The war provided Great Britain enormous territorial gains in North America, but disputes over subsequent frontier policy and paying the war's expenses led to colonial discontent, and ultimately to the American Revolution.

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
What was a MAIN reason why the Eastern Roman Empire lasted so much longer than the Western Roman Empire?
zhenek [66]

Answer:

"Fall of Rome" redirects here. For other uses, see Fall of Rome (disambiguation).

"The Fall of the Roman Empire" redirects here. For the film, see The Fall of the Roman Empire (film).

The fall of the Western Roman Empire (also called the fall of the Roman Empire or the fall of Rome) was the process of decline in the Western Roman Empire in which the Empire failed to enforce its rule, and its vast territory was divided into several successor polities. The Roman Empire lost the strengths that had allowed it to exercise effective control over its Western provinces; modern historians posit factors including the effectiveness and numbers of the army, the health and numbers of the Roman population, the strength of the economy, the competence of the Emperors, the internal struggles for power, the religious changes of the period, and the efficiency of the civil administration. Increasing pressure from invading barbarians outside Roman culture also contributed greatly to the collapse. The reasons for the collapse are major subjects of the historiography of the ancient world and they inform much modern discourse on state failure.[1][2][3]

376, unmanageable numbers of Goths and other non-Roman people, fleeing from the Huns, entered the Empire. In 395, after winning two destructive civil wars, Theodosius I died, leaving a collapsing field army and the Empire, still plagued by Goths, divided between the warring ministers of his two incapable sons. Further barbarian groups crossed the Rhine and other frontiers and, like the Goths, were not exterminated, expelled or subjugated. The armed forces of the Western Empire became few and ineffective, and despite brief recoveries under able leaders, central rule was never effectively consolidated.

By 476, the position of Western Roman Emperor wielded negligible military, political, or financial power, and had no effective control over the scattered Western domains that could still be described as Roman. Barbarian kingdoms had established their own power in much of the area of the Western Empire. In 476, Odoacer deposed the last emperor in Italy, and the Western Senate sent the imperial insignia to the Eastern Emperor.

While its legitimacy lasted for centuries longer and its cultural influence remains today, the Western Empire never had the strength to rise again. It never again controlled any portion of Western Europe to the North of the Alps. The Eastern Roman, or Byzantine Empire survived, and though lessened in strength remained for centuries an effective power of the Eastern Mediterranean.

While the loss of political unity and military control is universally acknowledged, the Fall is not the only unifying concept for these events; the period described as Late Antiquity emphasizes the cultural continuities throughout and beyond the political collapse.

3 0
3 years ago
So is it B or C?????
jenyasd209 [6]
For what?????? :/
...........
7 0
3 years ago
Explain the document
ivann1987 [24]

Answer:

hmmm lets see............                        

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • As part of his Reconstruction plan, President Johnson thought the South should be treated
    14·2 answers
  • How many of the thirteen states needed to approve a law above a law before it could be passed under the articles of confederatio
    12·2 answers
  • 1. In a typical rural village in Mexico, you might expect to find that most people living on farms get their food by
    10·1 answer
  • What type of home does the family appear to live in
    11·1 answer
  • Why was the Berlin Wall built by Easy Germany?
    10·2 answers
  • Describe the souths particular attitude towards the negroes of the time compared with the norths attitude
    9·1 answer
  • Which place did the Vikings raid frequently
    5·1 answer
  • What does ratify look like
    13·1 answer
  • Which dynasty of China was controlled by foreigners (people outside of China)? O Ming Song Sui Yuan Question 2​
    5·2 answers
  • Who was the best president
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!