Basically, the Sarbanes Oxley Act was not a single Act, but a series of Acts that were designed to expand starting requirements for companies such as firms and overall businesses. Section 404 is one of the Acts that are specifically set on the company's control on their financial reports made. As a result, internal management or more commonly known as the Internal Affairs program of a company must provide a detailed and clear-written (straight-to-the-point) report on the company's structure (how they do things) and creating, or establishing, a set of procedures on how they plan to report their financial status.
Answer:
When prices drop people usually go buy it even if it is a little drop.
Explanation:
They go because of a phycological difference in price.
Based on the scenario above, it is suggested that Girard
practices the management by walking around. The MBWA or the management by
walking around is a style where the management uses this with their managers
wandering in the workplaces to check their employees.
Answer:
4 shirts
Explanation:
Principle of Optimization at the Margin states that the individual maximises utility when consuming a prpduct as long as the marginal benefit exceeds to marginal cost. If marginal cost is greater than the benefit the consumer will find another alternative.
In this instance Maria sees the short as value of $40, while sale price is $21
So when she buys the first shirt her perceived cost is now 40- 5= $35
For the second shirt perceived cost is 35-5= $30
For the third shirt perceived cost is 30-5= 25$
For the fourth shirt it is 25-5= $20
At this stage cost is slightly higher than the benefit and she will stop buying shirts.
Answer:
The correct option is B. False.
Further explanation is given below in the explanation section.
Explanation:
Offer From ABC Company to XYZ Company:
1,000,000 widgets to sell.
Selling Price of 1 widget = $1.00
Total Price = $1,000,000
Counter Offer from XYZ company to ABC Company.
Selling Price = $0.75
Total Price = 0.75 x 1,000,000 = $750,000
But in the end, ABC company sold its widgets to GHK company.
The correct option to this question is false.
This case is false because here ABC sends an original offer of $1 but XYZ sent a counter offer of $0.75. This counter offer was then duly rejected by ABC.
XYZ cannot again confirm and accept the original offer of ABC because they have already rejected your claim and thus XYZ have to wait until ABC make them another offer.
