Answer:
They both make amazing food
Explanation:
i was in yoir class
Answer:
voidable , dis-affirmed
Explanation:
According to my research, contracts made with minors are considered as voidable contracts and can be dis-affirmed (declare void). This is because in many states a minor (anyone under 18 years old) is thought to lack the capacity or understanding of what he/she is signing. Therefore as long as the minor is under the age of 18 (and for a couple of days after becoming 18) they can dis-affirm the contract.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
Answer:
Mrs. Merriweather
Explanation:
In chapter 24, Scout participates in Aunt Alexandra´s missionary circle where she listens to Mrs. Merriweather´s display of prejudice towards foreign cultures and also criticizes indirectly Atticus<em> </em>for defending Tom. Scout realizes that Merriweather´s views of Atticus are to be considered hypocritical, taking in account that the missionary circle is being held at Atticus´ home.
By producing a significant number of an item the production cost of said item decreases, thus leading to a larger profit margin.
- I hope this helps :)
Answer: This isn't really understood, because not all societies formed governments in the sense of western hierarchical systems, and not all governments formed under the same conditions. It is one of those mysteries, which means it was a gradual thing, and not a sudden seasonal change from anarchy to government. The first government accumulated within a group of people who spoke the same language, and there was some pressure on them that required some level of organization for the distribution of resources and labor, so it seems, but even as I write this I know that is far too simple.
For thousands of years it was believed there was a natural hegemony bestowed by divine power, then, there was the American Revolution and the idea of government was turned upside down. Following that was Karl Marx, who suggested that government was a mechanism of oppression to control the means of production and wealth accumulation, but all of the hypotheses built from this idea, which most of modern thinking can find some degree of lineage to, are problematic to be nice, and outright failures at the other extreme.
Quick answer is, there are a thousand answers, none of which have proven to be universal, so they are only partially right.
There is a lot of room for research in this area.
