1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
AlladinOne [14]
2 years ago
12

Based on your reading of the following, choose the best answer.

Law
1 answer:
alisha [4.7K]2 years ago
5 0

Answer:

am not sure but I can say you all the best....

You might be interested in
How do NGOs help in a humanitarian crisis?
sveticcg [70]

Answer:

Humanitarian NGOs aid people who are suffering, particularly victims of armed conflict, famines, and natural disasters. ... Comprised mainly of doctors and health workers providing assistance to populations in distress and victims of disaster and armed conflict.

Explanation:

3 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
There are many modes of constitutional interpretation. In 500 words discuss two forms (i.e., aspirationalism, strict constructio
Vera_Pavlovna [14]

Answer:

There are three basic modes of constitutional interpretation: strict construction, aspirationalism, and textualism. The strict construction approach seeks to apply the Constitution according to what it says explicitly rather than based on desirable social consequences; the aspirational approach applies the Constitution based on societal standards regardless of whether it contradicts what it says, and the textualist approach looks only at the text of laws regardless of their effect on society.

The literal interpretation assumes that the US Constitution was set in stone by an all-knowing entity. If this is true, then what use are the amendments if one had already decided the outcome of every single dispute ever framed under them? The idea of being open to interpretation is so that new issues can be solved using old principles. Yes, some people may choose to "go rogue" with these principles come up, but I side with keeping my own freedoms limited for greater freedoms for others. And finally, aspirationalism takes into account that America's founding fathers wanted aspirations, not just laws. They would have understood that sometimes even they couldn't agree on moral solutions, and they knew times change over time.

I prefer strict aspirational because it takes into account social progress. The Constitution is meant to be a living document that isn't static, and the Constitution was written in a time when slavery, women's suffrage and segregation were still acceptable. The Constitution needs to evolve with society and make sense in modern times - interpretations.

The Constitution was written at a time when slavery was legal in America - aspirationalism would have been impossible back then. The Constitution works on interpretation - if it didn't, we wouldn't need it. Over time, we've developed aspirationalism to be able to interpret the Constitution more fairly. It's not what the Constitution says, it's how well society can agree to interpret that.

Explanation:

The modes of constitutional interpretation are two of the most popular ways in which constitutional law is interpreted. An aspirationalist judge would favor arguments that all legislation should follow the “original intent” of the constitution while strict constructionists follows the literal text of the constitution.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Under what circumstances may a president be sued
Afina-wow [57]

Answer: Yes I think so let me tell you why.

Explanation: depositions from several women who have accused President Donald Trump of bad things prior to being elected President of the United States.  President Trump kissed her twice on the lips without her permission.  Zervos filed a defamation lawsuit in New York state court.

So that is you're answer. If you need anything else let me know.

3 0
2 years ago
True or false - military courts impose the death penalty.
hoa [83]
The answer is false. They can not impose the death penalty
6 0
3 years ago
What would you do if you see someone robbing a house​
stepan [7]

Answer:

I would most definitely go and help the family of that house and call 911 as I head over so I would have a sort of back up just in case something went wrong.

Explanation:

I just have to stall the robber for time if I were to get hurt so the police can arrive although I could handle myself.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • In the Katz vs United States case what is the constitutional issue involved in this case
    9·1 answer
  • Can crimes truly be victimless?
    13·1 answer
  • Gm everybody <br> What is one strength and one weakness of the Police Commission Model?
    13·1 answer
  • Substantively, is there a difference between an agency rule and a legal statute?
    5·1 answer
  • Can animal wildlife protection be an amendment, or do amendment have to affect humans?
    11·1 answer
  • Operations law includes:
    7·1 answer
  • Who is motomoto who who who who
    14·2 answers
  • Which amendment guarantees a trial by jury if accused of a crime?
    6·1 answer
  • What does 'distributive justice' mean in philosophy?.
    6·1 answer
  • _____ means that laws must be applied fairly and equally to all people, especially to a citizen accused of a crime.
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!