Polyethylene is used in applications ranging for films, tubes, plastic parts, laminates, etc.
Quizlet said case law.
Here's the flashcards:
https://quizlet.com/64437199/criminal-law-flash-cards/
Have a great day!
Answer:
You can't ask for an essay to be written for you on Brainly, even if someone did write it for you it'd quickly be figured out when your teacher checks the contents of the essay for plagiarism.
Answer: Reflect - In your own words, explain the meaning and purpose of the Fourteenth Amendment. You should use phrases from the amendment to complement your explanation, but not replace it.
Analyze – Explain how the cases of Bakke, the VMI, and Grutter relate to the Fourteenth Amendment.
Evaluate - Do policies that assist a specific group of people fulfill or violate the Fourteenth Amendment? Explain the reasons for your response.
Reflect/Research – Is your opinion on question three consistent or in conflict with your opinion on other cases or laws? Give an example from your study in this course. (You might consider your opinion from Case Study Three. It asked whether juveniles accused of serious crimes should be treated as adults.)
Explanation:
Answer:
Explanation:
A lower court judge in a bankruptcy proceeding], having found Cannon's briefs to be ofunusually high quality, issued an order directing Cannon to certify that he was the author of the two briefs in question. Cannon filed a response indicating that both briefs were his soleresponsibility and that they "relied heavily" upon an article entitled Why Professionals Must beInterested in "Disinterestedness" Under the Bankruptcy Codeby William H. Schrag and MarkC. Haut. Cannon further admitted that his initial brief "exceeded permissible fair use withoutattestation" of the source. He reported he had informed his client about his mistake as well asthe bar association.The bankruptcy court initiated sanction proceedings against Cannon. The bankruptcy courtconcluded that seventeen of the nineteen pages of legal analysis in the initial brief wereverbatim excerpts from the article, with only variations for format and deletion of mattersdetrimental to Cannon's position . . .In light of its conclusion that Cannon committed plagiarism and charged an unreasonable fee,the bankruptcy court ordered Cannon to (1) complete a law-school-equivalent course inprofessional responsibility, (2) disgorge the fee charged to his client for the briefs' preparation,(3) formally notify the authors of the plagiarized article and provide the court with a copy of thecorrespondence, and (4) provide copies of the sanction order to Chief Judge Pratt and the[disciplinary] board.WHAT ADDITIONAL PENALTY WAS PROPOSED?Attorney Cannon and the [attorney] disciplinary board settled on a "Public Reprimand" [a public recordthat can severely impact a career] . . .WHY DID THE IOWA SUPREME COURT APPROVE THE “PUBLIC REPRIMAND” PENALTY?The Iowa Supreme Court decided to approve the public reprimand:
