1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
NeX [460]
3 years ago
14

This app is so dumb so im just gonna give points to everybodythings its a big deal its A STUPID APP duh so just take it but why

would u it is stupid but anyways if ur one of those ppl that things this app is life go head i guess
Law
2 answers:
Schach [20]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

If this app is dum.b, then don't go on this app...

Explanation:

kykrilka [37]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

Thanks home slice

Explanation:

You might be interested in
How do you start a negotiation?​
kati45 [8]

Answer:

you start a negotiation by negotiation about a topic

Explanation:

7 0
1 year ago
Read 2 more answers
According to the ___________ doctrine, officers are permitted to search and to seize evidence, without a warrant, on private pro
Salsk061 [2.6K]

The open field doctrine states that officers are allowed to search and take evidence on private property outside of the immediate vicinity of a dwelling without obtaining a warrant.

- A "warrantless search of the area outside a property owner's curtilage" does not violate the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution, according to the open-fields doctrine (also known as the open-field doctrine or open-fields rule) in American criminal procedural law.

- Explains that as long as objects are immediately recognizable as being subject to seizure and are within the sight of an officer who is legally present in the location from where the view is made, they may be properly confiscated without a warrant (illegal).  

To know more about doctrine, kindly click on the link below :

brainly.com/question/11271619?referrer=searchResults

#SPJ4

   

7 0
1 year ago
Give an easy explaination on everything involving categorical syllogisms
Leno4ka [110]

Answer:

Consider, for example, the categorical syllogism: No geese are felines. ... Clearly, “Some birds are not felines” is the conclusion of this syllogism. The major term of the syllogism is “felines” (the predicate term of its conclusion), so “No geese are felines” (the premise in which “felines” appears) is its major premise.

Explanation:

7 0
2 years ago
What should a person who has been sexually assaulted not do?
Lyrx [107]

Answer: you should not see your go near the place it happened

Explanation:

3 0
2 years ago
Alcohol reduces the sensitivity of the cones in the eyes, making is more difficult to distinguish red from green.
777dan777 [17]

Answer:

A. True

Explanation:

hope it helps....

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • A candidate for president must be
    11·1 answer
  • A country with poor infrastructure and an undeveloped industrial base can be called a _____ country. Foreign Aid and the U.S.: S
    8·2 answers
  • Cosmetic Profits. Sally is the vice president at Big Name Cosmetics Company. Through important and material nonpublic informatio
    11·1 answer
  • What type of investigation is the effort expended by the police in gathering information subsequent to the initiation of the ori
    14·1 answer
  • PLEASE ANSWER
    7·2 answers
  • Please list or give three real life police brutality incidents in recent times (2019-2021)?
    15·1 answer
  • What is Limited company by Shares​
    13·1 answer
  • There has been a high rate of bicycle accidents in your community. The local police department has decided to host free bicycle
    11·2 answers
  • Please help me I’m not too sure about this one thank you if you help
    9·1 answer
  • This question is mde for scottrn9696 76+98+100+08^78(0908409)---0983710 E=mc^2
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!