Leadership is not needed when:
- It will make processes inefficient due to time wasting
- It is being used to oppress people
- Subordinates don't need leadership
Leadership is usually quite good as it can galvanize subordinates to be better workers due to better organization as well as inspiration.
There are instances where it is not needed however such as when:
- It slows down processes - sometimes leaders will need to give permission for a subordinate to do something. If this thing is time conscious and the leader is not available to give their ascent, the whole process could suffer.
- It oppresses people - when a leader is an oppressive one and acts in such a way that their subordinates suffer, that leadership is not needed.
- Subordinates are fine without it - sometimes workers have the necessary skills and experience to operate independently without a leader. In such a case, a leader is not needed.
In conclusion, while a leader is quite important in many ways, there can be situations where it is best that they are not used.
<em>Find out more at brainly.com/question/24150490.</em>
Answer:
d. Is an acceptable strategy once a need has been identified and a suitable product has been selected.
Explanation:
A face to face selling of a product directly to business is one of the best example of personal selling e.g. cars, photocopier, office equipment etc.
Answer:
The correct answer is E
Explanation:
Phishing is the term which is defined as group of individual or the malicious individual who are scam users. This is done by sending the emails or creating the web pages which are designed in order to collect the information of online bank, other login information or credit card information of an individual.
So, Ben is the victim of phishing, as the fraud is done with him by sending the emails.
Answer:
Theresa has $6,000 in equity.
Explanation:
To get this answer, you take the value of her car ($15,000) and subtract the amount that she owes from it ($15,000-$9,000). This gives you $6,000.
Hope this helps!
Answer:
$12,000
Explanation:
The main difference between cash basis accounting and accrual accounting is that accrual accounting recognizes revenue only after the earning process is completed. On the other hand, cash basis accounting recognizes revenue and expenses when the money is received or paid, regardless of when the service is provided. This is why the US GAAP doesn't allow cash basis accounting.
The IRS allows cash basis accounting for individuals and small businesses that only deal with cash payments, but they must meet certain criteria:
- partnerships or C corporations with less than $5 million in yearly revenue
- sole proprietorships and S corporations with less than $1 million in yearly revenues
- family owned farms
- you provide personal services and 95% of your revenue comes from it
- no publicly traded corporation is allowed
