Function A:

. Vertical asymptotes are in the form x=, and they are a vertical line that the function approaches but never hits. They can be easily found by looking for values of <em>x</em> that can not be graphed. In this case, <em>x</em> cannot equal 0, as we cannot divide by 0. Therefore <em>x</em>=0 is a vertical asymptote for this function. The horizontal asymptote is in the form <em>y</em>=, and is a horizontal line that the function approaches but never hits. It can be found by finding the limit of the function. In this case, as <em>x</em> increases, 1/<em>x</em> gets closer and closer to 0. As that part of the function gets closer to 0, the overall function gets closer to 0+4 or 4. Thus y=4 would be the horizontal asymptote for function A.
Function B: From the graph we can see that the function approaches the line x=2 but never hits. This is the vertical asymptote. We can also see from the graph that the function approaches the line x=1 but never hits. This is the horizontal asymptote.
Answer:
D. If John owns a dog, then he owns a cat
Step-by-step explanation:
The implication p → q (if p, then q) has the same truth table as the logical expression ~p∨q. You have the expression ...
~(John owns a dog) ∨ (he owns a cat)
Matching parts of this expression to the components of the expression ~p∨q, we see we can choose ...
- p = John owns a dog
- q = he owns a cat
and put those into the structure of the implication: if p, then q.
If John owns a dog, then he owns a cat. . . . . matches choice D
<span>25/45 = 5/9 = 10/18 = 15/27 = 20/36</span>
Try getting a graphing calculator they help a lot
X has no coefficient so it will be the fastest to multiply which would be solving for y but it is the reason why it is better to solve for y first