1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
kotegsom [21]
3 years ago
5

Do you think individuals should be able to open companies anonymously? Why or why not?

Business
1 answer:
adoni [48]3 years ago
8 0
Well im stuck in the middle so ill give you to reasons 


why i think they shouldnt be able to:
cuz they might wanna open it just as a scam and might try scamming and/or harming others



why i think they should be able to:
if they have a great idea and can prove its not a scam then im all for it ppl should be able to share and give their idea's to the world no matter howw far fetched they may seem 

also ur question requiers an opinion so it should be what YOU  think not just what others think :) in this type of question it would be best to go with ur own answer cuz there is no right or wrong anyways have a nice day :)
You might be interested in
Rex's doughnuts can produce only 100 doughnuts a day. the variable cost incurred per unit is $2 and fixed costs incurred per day
vladimir1956 [14]
The total cost that is incurred by producing 100 doughnuts is equal to the sum of the variable cost and the fixed cost. The total variable cost is,
    total variable cost = ($2/doughnut)(100 doughnuts) = $200

The total cost is,
   Total cost = total variable cost + total fixed cost
     TC = $200 + $500 = $700

Equating the cost and the revenue,
     TC = TR
     $700 = (100)(x)

The value of x from the equation is $7.

ANSWER: $7. 
3 0
3 years ago
what is the quistan to nunber four pleas help me i realy need your help if you cant help me thats fine but can you try to help m
DochEvi [55]
Yeah there is not question or upload up there

8 0
3 years ago
If the economy is hit by a negative real shock that raises inflation and unemployment, which fiscal policy action should the gov
aev [14]

Answer: There is no fiscal policy action that can keep the inflation and unemployment stable.

Explanation:

If there is a negative real shock such as an oil crisis, it will be hard fir the affected economy to adjust and be stable.

A negative real shock will lead to a reduction in growth and a rise in inflation. Even in cases whereby there is an increase in the money supply, this will lead to a rise in real growth but the result will be that there will be an higher inflation

Therefore, there is no fiscal policy action that can keep the inflation and unemployment stable.

8 0
3 years ago
Suppose that the S&P 500, with a beta of 1.0, has an expected return of 13% and T-bills provide a risk-free return of 4%. a.
Aleksandr [31]

Answer:

a. The answers are as follows:

(i) Expected of Return of Portfolio = 4%; and Beta of Portfolio = 0

(ii) Expected of Return of Portfolio = 6.25%; and Beta of Portfolio = 0.25

(iii) Expected of Return of Portfolio = 8.50%; and Beta of Portfolio = 0.50

(iv) Expected of Return of Portfolio = 10.75%; and Beta of Portfolio = 0.75

(v) Expected of Return of Portfolio = 13%; and Beta of Portfolio = 1.0

b. Change in expected return = 9% increase

Explanation:

Note: This question is not complete as part b of it is omitted. The complete question is therefore provided before answering the question as follows:

Suppose that the S&P 500, with a beta of 1.0, has an expected return of 13% and T-bills provide a risk-free return of 4%.

a. What would be the expected return and beta of portfolios constructed from these two assets with weights in the S&P 500 of (i) 0; (ii) 0.25; (iii) 0.50; (iv) 0.75; (v) 1.0

b. How does expected return vary with beta? (Do not round intermediate calculations.)

The explanation to the answers are now provided as follows:

a. What would be the expected return and beta of portfolios constructed from these two assets with weights in the S&P 500 of (i) 0; (ii) 0.25; (iii) 0.50; (iv) 0.75; (v) 1.0

To calculate these, we use the following formula:

Expected of Return of Portfolio = (WS&P * RS&P) + (WT * RT) ………… (1)

Beta of Portfolio = (WS&P * BS&P) + (WT * BT) ………………..………………. (2)

Where;

WS&P = Weight of S&P = (1) – (1v)

RS&P = Return of S&P = 13%, or 0.13

WT = Weight of T-bills = 1 – WS&P

RT = Return of T-bills = 4%, or 0.04

BS&P = 1.0

BT = 0

After substituting the values into equation (1) & (2), we therefore have:

(i) Expected return and beta of portfolios with weights in the S&P 500 of 0 (i.e. WS&P = 0)

Using equation (1), we have:

Expected of Return of Portfolio = (0 * 0.13) + ((1 - 0) * 0.04) = 0.04, or 4%

Using equation (2), we have:

Beta of Portfolio = (0 * 1.0) + ((1 - 0) * 0) = 0

(ii) Expected return and beta of portfolios with weights in the S&P 500 of 0.25 (i.e. WS&P = 0.25)

Using equation (1), we have:

Expected of Return of Portfolio = (0.25 * 0.13) + ((1 - 0.25) * 0.04) = 0.0625, or 6.25%

Using equation (2), we have:

Beta of Portfolio = (0.25 * 1.0) + ((1 - 0.25) * 0) = 0.25

(iii) Expected return and beta of portfolios with weights in the S&P 500 of 0.50 (i.e. WS&P = 0.50)

Using equation (1), we have:

Expected of Return of Portfolio = (0.50 * 0.13) + ((1 - 0.50) * 0.04) = 0.0850, or 8.50%

Using equation (2), we have:

Beta of Portfolio = (0.50 * 1.0) + ((1 - 0.50) * 0) = 0.50

(iv) Expected return and beta of portfolios with weights in the S&P 500 of 0.75 (i.e. WS&P = 0.75)

Using equation (1), we have:

Expected of Return of Portfolio = (0.75 * 0.13) + ((1 - 0.75) * 0.04) = 0.1075, or 10.75%

Using equation (2), we have:

Beta of Portfolio = (0.75 * 1.0) + ((1 - 0.75) * 0) = 0.75

(v) Expected return and beta of portfolios with weights in the S&P 500 of 1.0 (i.e. WS&P = 1.0)

Using equation (1), we have:

Expected of Return of Portfolio = (1.0 * 0.13) + ((1 – 1.0) * 0.04) = 0.13, or 13%

Using equation (2), we have:

Beta of Portfolio = (1.0 * 1.0) + (1 – 1.0) * 0) = 1.0

b. How does expected return vary with beta? (Do not round intermediate calculations.)

There expected return will increase by the percentage of the difference between Expected Return and Risk free rate. That is;

Change in expected return = Expected Return - Risk free rate = 13% - 4% = 9% increase

4 0
3 years ago
Which of the following characteristics would lead the auditor to assess control risk at a higher level?a. It is difficult for th
Yuri [45]

Answer:

E. All of the above.

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • In which area did government deregulation benefit both businesses and consumers (points 3)
    9·1 answer
  • Crowder Company acquired a tract of land containing an extractable natural resource. Coronado is required by its purchase contra
    5·1 answer
  • Using the expanded accounting equation, calculate and enter the answers for each question. You will need to use the answers you
    6·1 answer
  • If a country has positive net capital outflows, then its net exports are a. positive, and its saving is larger than its domestic
    5·1 answer
  • If a purchase agreement says to release earnest money after the inspection date, then the seller demands the money be release pr
    6·1 answer
  • Mary visits her local shopping mall to purchase some much needed additions to her wardrobe. In selecting the items she wants to
    14·1 answer
  • An analysis of the accounts of Roberts Company reveals the following manufacturing cost data for the month ended June 30, 2020.
    6·1 answer
  • Daniel Co. has 500 employees who work 8-hour days and are paid hourly. On January 1, 2020, Daniel started granting its employees
    10·1 answer
  • Explain the relationships between a firm’s short-run production function and its short-run cost function .Focus on the marginal
    13·1 answer
  • Drag each label to the correct category. the economy of a country has been growing at an annual rate of 8%. determine the causes
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!