Answer: Option (d) is correct.
Explanation:
According to the law of supply, it states that there is a positive relationship between the price of a commodity and the quantity supplied of a commodity. This means that as the price of a commodity increases, as a result the quantity supplied of that commodity increases.
Therefore, any change occur in the prices of a commodity will affect the quantity supplied of a commodity not supply of a commodity.
Answer:
Their combined production should be 20 clothes and 12 wines.
Explanation:
<u>Argentina's opportunity cost to produce 1 unit of cloth = 0.1 wine</u>
Argentina's opportunity cost to produce 1 unit of wine = 10 clothes
Chile's opportunity cost to produce 1 unit of cloth = 0.5 wine
<u>Chile's opportunity cost to produce 1 unit of wine = 2 clothes</u>
Since Argentina' opportunity cost to produce clothes is lower, then it should specialize int he production of clothes. While Chile should specialize in the production of wine. Their combined production should be 20 clothes and 12 wines.
Answer:
B) The coupon rate could be less than, equal to, or greater than 6%, depending on the specific terms set, but in the real world the convertible feature would probably cause the coupon rate to be less than 6%.
Explanation:
Amram Inc. is issuing two bonds, one is not convertible and the other one is convertible and callable. Regardless of the coupon rate that they plan to set, convertible and callable bonds will usually (almost always) have a coupon rate that is lower than non-convertible or non-callable bonds.
Convertible bonds are bonds that can be converted or exchanged to common stock. Since convertible bonds offer more investment options, their risk is lower than non-convertible bonds.
Callable bonds is a bond that can be redeemed before the maturity date.
Answer:
Option D. The accountant was a member of a professional organization.
Explanation:
The reason is that for a successful claim under the negligence act, the claimant have to prove following three things:
- Duty of care existed between the relation
- She has suffered economic harm &
- The harm was proximately caused by the accountant's breach of the duty of care.
So the accountant's membership is not a valid requirement under the negligence act for a successful claim.
Dgdtukdukyruryftctuiiiiìihvfrte4hs3tgsyrsysjrsi5e