Answer:
I'm pretty sure the punctuation error is in the third sentence;
<em>'This struggle plays out chiefly through the protagonist; Charlie, who anchors the film brilliantly.'</em>
Just after the word 'protagonist', the author uses a semi-colon (;). A semi-colon is used to link two separate clauses that have similar ideas together. It turns two clauses into one.
In this situation, the semi-colon is not doing that, because that would imply that if we were to separate the "two clauses", it would look like this:
<em>"This struggle plays out chiefly through the protagonist. Charlie, who anchors the film brilliantly." </em>
This wouldn't make sense. Instead of a semi-colon, the author should've used a comma!
Answer:
Saving the kids that were in the church during the fire
Explanation:
Answer:
Impossible to say <u>(READ THE EXPLANATION)</u>
Explanation:
It is incredibly hard to say what would’ve/wouldn’t have happened for events that have passed. I imagine that they still would’ve lost (US would’ve caught up and far exceeded eventually). The Battle of the Atlantic would have been different. Although the British did develop radar first, the Germans used it far better and far more often than the Allies did. Actually, the Germans used a more advanced radar system that the allies didn‘t come up woth till perhaps the end of the war. The long and short of it is the same would’ve happens because the Germans used it better and more often than the Allies until about 1944.
Explanation:
Because McDonald's is the second largest chain of fast food around the world. There are around 36,000 outlets worldwide. People are so in love with McDonald's and so crazy about it that people started to eat as their meal everyday. So Morgan Spurlock wanted to show what could happen if kept living on McDonald's.
