<u>Answer</u>: The <u>Legalists </u>philosophers believed that every aspect of life should be governed by strict and impersonal laws.
The Legalism is the third intellectual current that flourished in China before the unification by the Qin Dynasty. The three centuries before the unification were so rich in terms of political thought that is known as “The Golden Age of Chinese Philosophy” with “The Hundred Schools” of thoughts. Other famous schools in this period are Confucianism and Taoism.
The long period of war were times of great chaos and disorder. Profound changes happened during these three centuries – economical, military and social changes. A new administrative approach needed to arise and the Legalists were at the forefront of this innovation.
Legalism is the most practical current of that period. Legalists would not focus on philosophical speculations, such as the evolution of the human nature, morality or divine will. Instead, they focus on how to achieve the goal of unification. Nothing, not even the past, could distract them of this goal. Because of that, they defended that the past doesn’t teach a thing and doesn’t shape the present or the future, but a radical change in the present is the only way to restructure the society. This change could only happen by “the rule of the law”, where individual morality of the ruled and the rulers are not taken into consideration. They believed that every aspect of life should be governed by strict and impersonal laws. Applying those is the radical change that would create a powerful government, able to coerce its subjects and install a rich state and a powerful army. In that scenario, the state has the ultimate authority and such power is given to it by means of military strength.
Answer:
Attention cannot truly and fully be split between separate tasks.
Answer:
the last answer
Explanation:
because they have so many electoriol votes in each state and who ever wins the most votes in each state wins the presidential election.
The unequal access of males and females to property power and prestige is referred to as "<span>Gender stratification".
Gender stratification alludes to the level of disparity in the public arena in light of sex, the social qualities related with sex. In particular, gender stratification alludes to the differential capacity of people to get to society's assets and to get its benefits. As gender stratification expands, so does the level of sex imbalance, reflecting more prominent contrasts amongst people's entrance to control.
</span>
Answer:
Explanation:
yes because this led him to easy going manner belied an interior toughness
