Zachary Taylor attacked, won over and controlled the northeastern provinces of Mexico. While he had a de-facto power over them, the problem was that the Mexican government did not want to accept this officially.
In order to counter the last problem, Scott attacked Mexico City and controlled it in 1847, after which Mexico had to concede the northeastern territories.
I believe the first is the correct answer, it makes the most sense. Hope this helps you :)
Answer:
His purchase of a new apartment would most likely be done through extended decision making, while his purchase of upcoming job things would be made through limited decision-making behavior.
Explanation: Extended decision making involves purchases of very important things, in which you have to analyze carefully the options and usually be ready to make a considerable investment in the object you're looking into. Limited decision making is not as complex and as important as the extended decision, so it's not needed to analyze multiple options in order to decide what the purchase is going to be. Having this in mind, it's easier to see that the apartment relates to extended decision making, since buying a new place is something very important to someone, while purchasing some things for an upcoming job might not be that complicated to decide.
The answer is that the pilots decided to proceed to a secondary location, and they found and attacked Japanese carriers.
Instead of returning to base, aviators made what Admiral Nimitz would later call "one of the most important decisions of the battle."
The pilots then proceeded to an unlikely secondary location. There, they found the Japanese carriers — unprepared. Immediately, fighters destroyed one of the four Japanese vessels. Other Americans rushed onto the scene to continue the attack. This event shifted the tide of battle to favor the Americans, wresting victory from Japanese hands.
Answer:
Option D
Explanation:
All of the above because they all address the statement;
Option A: Your Neighbor is better off specializing in picking cherries because its only in apples that you pick at lower opportunity cost than your neighbor
Option B: You can trade some of your apples for some of your neighbor cherries because you are at advantage over your neighbor over the apples so if you are interested in cherries, you can trade some apples for cherries with your neighbor and both of you will be fine.
Option C: You have a comparative advantage in picking apples because you pick them at lower opportunity cost than your neighbor.
So all the options are true in some sense out of it.
All of the above is the best answer.
