1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Paul [167]
3 years ago
14

Myron Effriham is out of money. However, he will be paid in two days. Myron knows that he can cash a personal check with his emp

loyer at any time. He also has figured out that if he folds the check he’s about to write many times and wets the crease over the electronic coding, the automatic check-routing machines will kick it out to be handled manually. Manual handling will cause at least another day’s delay before the check gets to his bank. Therefore, he could cash a check late today and, in effect, use his employer’s money to live on until payday. Is this ethical? Would anyone be injured by Myron’s action? Is it illegal?
Law
1 answer:
AnnZ [28]3 years ago
4 0

This is not ethical, he should ask for their help instead of just taking it. No one would be injured and everyone would probably be okay. It is illegal because he would use his employers money to live on until payday and its not his money.

You might be interested in
Today, every State’s constitution?
andrew11 [14]

B. follows the national pattern of provide only a broad outlined of governmental structure

3 0
3 years ago
why do an increasing number of Americans, the same people who admire slender look so often featured in the media, exercise too l
dolphi86 [110]
Can you explain this differently so i can answer it ?
3 0
3 years ago
Ellen is a probation officer who has submitted a report to the judge that will be used in the sentencing decision of a defendant
katovenus [111]

Answer:

ellen is stupid dumb retarted and ugly

Explanation:

this is because your mom said so

stupid

7 0
4 years ago
Regional courts were set up for the united states with the
Viktor [21]

Answer:

Judiciary Act 1801

Explanation:

The judiciary act of 1801 which was overturned by the Jeffersonian republicans were part of the politically-motivated attempt made by the federalists in the U.S congress and the administration of John Adams to fill the federal courts with federalists.  Federal courts were used as political means to persecute those who criticized the actions of the federalists and a strong political opposition came into place by Thomas Jefferson, and his team helped in passing the Federal Judiciary act of 1801.  

The number of Supreme Court judges was reduced from six to five by the act and the act also created six new federal circuit courts in different region of the United States of America.  

5 0
3 years ago
Your bicycle has a mass of 9.1 kilograms. You accelerate at a rate of 1.79 m/s2.
PSYCHO15rus [73]

Answer:

i belive it should be 7.36kg

Explanation:

use formula A=F /m

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • 1. Do you think solitary confinement is ethical? If not, explain what makes the practice unethical. If so, explain the circumsta
    13·1 answer
  • FORUM DESCRIPTION
    15·1 answer
  • What did the Founding Fathers have in mind when they created a shared power system?
    15·1 answer
  • Lara was examining a crime scene she found a piece of cloth at the scene which she thought might have some finger prints she use
    10·1 answer
  • Based on the facts of the previous question, Jay stays in the hospital for a few days as he is recuperating. Then, a couple of w
    12·1 answer
  • Describe the preamble of the constitution
    6·2 answers
  • Which of these is an example of separation of powers?
    8·1 answer
  • Why are some forms of speech not protected by the First Amendment?
    11·1 answer
  • Because of the dominance of the two-party system, ______________ candidates often struggle to raise both funds and the visibilit
    14·1 answer
  • What is the concept ethics ?
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!