Answer:
The first one uses adventure appeal to try and get the reader to imagine themselves on an adventure with this "super awesome camera"
The second one uses a statistics appeal, they are telling the reader "here is why our product is better than other people's" and "here's what percent of people liked our product so you will too"
Explanation:
Hope this helps a little!
Buck is a Saint Bernard
Shepherd dog living the good life. He lives in Santa Clara Valley with his
owner, Judge Miller. He is a domesticated dog until he is stolen and sent to
Alaska where strong sled dogs are in demand. Buck undergoes a series of adventures
where he must shed his pampered doggy past and learn what it means to be wild.
Buck must find his inner-wolf through many trials and tribulations.
Buck - the protagonist,
part Saint Bernard and part Scottish Shepherd. At first, Buck is a pampered dog
living in the Santa Clara Valley in California. As the story progresses, Buck
changes as he is forced to work as a sled dog in the harsh conditions of the
Yukon.
The story's climax occurs
when John Thorton rescues Buck and a true bond is re-established between Buck
and a human. As for a solution or resolution, this occurs when John Thorton is
killed, and Buck no longer has any emotional ties..... he is then free to
return to the wild.
Answer:On July 6, 1881, a storm in Iowa caused a railroad track to be flooded. Seeing this, Kate Shelley took action
to ensure that no train would cross the flooded track. As you read, take notes on what Kate endured to help
people who were in danger
Explanation:
Damage the purity or appearance of mar or spoil
Answer:
It should be raised
Explanation:
A scientifically proven fact that the brain does not reach maturity until the age of 25. For males, their hormonal changes are still taking place at the age of 30 where they fully mature into a man's body.
If the brain or body are not mature at the age of 18 then the definition of an adult is not attached to maturity or development but to existence and expectation.
It is wholly unfair to determine the level of one's intellect based on the time of existence rather than it's actual capability.
In that same vein, every individual matures differently and it might be in the best interest of the offender if they are given an evaluation to determine their capacity and then they can be appropriately charged for a crime.
