I believe the answer is: causality.
The initial assumption above is that a teenager who use drugs would most likely influence other non-users to use drug. There is nothing from the finding that disprove otherwise. So, when user hang out with non-users, there is a pretty good chance that the non-users could influence the users to stop consuming the drug.
An experimenter provides hints as to the preferred responses. the result is that the study produces results consistent with the hypothesis. However, the results may reflect: Experimentor bias.
Bias can occur in a variety of ways, including manipulating results, selecting certain participants knowingly, and selecting certain participants unknowingly.
If a researcher knows the outcome of their experiment ahead of time, it is possible that bias will be introduced into their research in order to prove their hypothesis correct.
For example, if a scientist is researching the effects of tobacco and already knows that it is harmful to the body, they may conduct an experiment in which they force their participants to consume tobacco in excessive amounts in order to prove their hypothesis correct.
To learn more about experimentor bias visit brainly.com/question/14587414?referrer=searchResults
#SPJ4
Answer: I don’t know
Explanation: But I have the same test as you, and the same question
Answer:
according to my point of view I think it's part c
Prob C. cause the sound wave would hit a wall and reflect off of it to come back to your ears.
