Answer:
The answer is "No"
Explanation:
With the end of the Cold War, researchers found religions development as a ground breaking political power in the contemporary world however it might have been there from the start.
Similarly as there isn't simple approach to characterize religion, so there is no relapse examination conceivable to state when religion is a significant reason alone, when it is a significant however auxiliary reason, and when it is a guise used to encourage war. History is, all things considered, not a science. Yet, religion, when used by a state, causes battle to appear to be good by legitimating it as in reason, declaring that murdering is morally supported, and giving comfort to the dispossessed.
The colonists had become frustrated by Britain's levying of a series of taxes on them to get out of debt incurred during the French and Indian War. The colonists felt that taxation without representation was unfair. Things came to a head in Boston in 1773 when colonists dumped 340 chests of tea into Boston Harbor in protest of the Tea Act. In response, the British government passed the Intolerable Acts, which included the closing of Boston Harbor. At the First Continental Congress, held in 1774, the colonists united to oppose Britain. The British ordered troops to march on Concord in 1775 in search of an arsenal. The first shots of the war were fired on April 19, 1775.
After the conclusion of the french and indian war i believe. I hope this helps
I believe it's candidates :)