All categories

3 years ago

What is the formula to find the measure of each interior angle of a regular polygon

Mathematics

1 answer:

Setler [38]3 years ago

7 0

Answer:

A regular polygon is a flat shape whose sides are all equal and whose angles are all equal. The formula for finding the sum of the measure of the interior angles is (n - 2) * 180. To find the measure of one interior angle, we take that formula and divide by the number of sides n: (n - 2) * 180 / n.

Step-by-step explanation:

There ya go.. :)

You might be interested in

What is a range of numbers?

iragen [17]

To find the range of numbers we subtract the largest number by the lowest numbers.

In the given question,

We have to explain, the range of a numbers.

The range refers to all the entities (output) that result from a relation or function. The Range set is made up of all used output values (dependent values).

The difference between both the highest and lowest numbers in a collection or set is known as the range.

To find the range of numbers we subtract the largest number by the lowest numbers.

To learn more about range link is here

brainly.com/question/4786835

#SPJ4

7 0

1 year ago

you are given eight golf balls. Seven of the golf balls have the exact same weight, but one ball is slightly lighter(you cannot

Inessa [10]

7 weight exactly the same, therefore the 8th golf ball doesnt weigh the same as the 7. so the 8th ball is slightly lighter

6 0

3 years ago

1/4y + 1 1/2 + 2 − 1 3/4y − 12 = ?

pantera1 [17]

Brung like terms together:-
1/4 y - 1 3/4 y + 11/2 + 2 - 12
= - 1 1/2 y + 11/2 - 10
= - 1 1/2y - 9/2

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

The manager of a local nightclub has recently surveyed a random sample of 280 customers of the club. She would now like to deter

Lunna [17]

Answer:

$z = \frac{35.6-35}{\frac{5}{\sqrt{280}}}= 2.007$

$p_v = P(z>2.007) = 0.0224$

Since the p value is lower than the significance level given of 0.05 we have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis on this case. And the best conclusion for this case is:

We (reject) the null hypothesis. That means that we (found) evidence to support the alternative.

Step-by-step explanation:

We have the following info given:

$\bar X = 35.6$ represent the sampel mean for the age of customers

$\sigma = 5$ represent the population standard deviation

$n = 280$ represent the sample size selected

We want to test if the mean age of her customers is over 35 so then the system of hypothesis for this case are:

Null hypothesis: $\mu \leq 35$

Alternative hypothesis $\mu >35$

The statistic for this case is given by:

$z = \frac{\bar X -\mu}{\frac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n}}}$

And replacing the data given we got:

$z = \frac{35.6-35}{\frac{5}{\sqrt{280}}}= 2.007$

We can calculate the p value since we are conducting a right tailed test like this:

$p_v = P(z>2.007) = 0.0224$

Since the p value is lower than the significance level given of 0.05 we have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis on this case. And the best conclusion for this case is:

We (reject) the null hypothesis. That means that we (found) evidence to support the alternative.

5 0

3 years ago

What is a appropriate metric unit for the mass of a television

Artist 52 [7]

The appropriate unit would be pounds/lbs.

7 0

3 years ago