The correct answer is the physical environment
There are several factors that contribute to change and innovation in a society: factors internal to the society itself or external factors of the environment that surrounds it. Nowadays, the extreme importance of the relationship between society and its environment has become very clear. The environment is not only a crucial source for the maintenance of society with its climatic and geographic characteristics in general, its natural wealth, its sources of energy, its flora and fauna, all functioning as a set of conditions in relation to which the society must adapt. In this process, society can interact with its environment in different ways and directions: either contributing to improve or to worsen and impair its living conditions. Changes in the environment end up forcing changes in society. Societies, throughout history, have needed to adjust to changes in the environment. This is an unquestionable adaptation process.
The environment to which a society must adapt also includes other societies with which it maintains contact. A major change in one tends to trigger a chain process with consequences for the others and forcing adjustments and innovations.
But there are other sources of change. The dynamics of forces within societies, which are part of the human condition itself, prevent society from remaining permanently stable. First, in the transmission of cultural heritage from one generation to another, changes of various types occur. As we saw earlier, individuals are not passive in forming habits, learning customs and receiving information as they grow and develop. Human beings are apparently, by their very nature, motivated to try new patterns of action. Motivation is often the simple curiosity that can be intensified by the cultural world. Or, the motivation may be simple material self-interest. Men seek to maximize their rewards, that is, to earn more and better as a result of their actions. In this way, experimentation and innovations are inevitable.
Answer:
It is nobler to die with integrity than to live with compromised principles
Explanation:
it is nobler to die with integrity then to live with principles that harm other strongly support the statement that men with integrity does not compromise with his principles he is self made person and he believes in his abilities and work on his own principles on the other side a man who compromises on his principles usually lacks confidence and is not capable enough to believe on his own abilities and is not able to make decisions on his own on the other side a man with integrity confidence is capable enough to even handle difficult of situation and can manage every problem very well as this phrase is mostly quoted in most of the texts
REBECCA NURSE a famous religious author also quoted as same that "It is nobler to die with integrity than to live with compromised principles that harm others" being a religious and follower of GOD she came on to the conclusion that in living with integrity is that what matters
Rather simply because for something to develop it has to be able to sustain itself or be sustained. Sustanability means to keep alive , while development refers to the growth of progress of.
please vote my answer brainliest. thanks!
