The people that will be assigned to the team include the sales and purchasing manager, members of the sales team, and the human resource manager.
<h3>How to illustrate the information?</h3>
Based on the information given, it was stated that the company produces a high-quality product, reasonable prices, and treat their employees fairly and equitably.
Since there's an increase in order, the sales department, purchasing department, and the human resources department will be involved.
The human resources manager will be in charge of recruiting staffs into the sales department that will help in handling the increase in orders.
Furthermore, it's important for OMA to remain a regional organization and after the chips are well known internationally, it can expand to become a national organization.
The Six Thinking Hats Model can be applied to make the decision by rotating the groups in order to foster new ideas and enhance collaboration.
Learn more about sales on:
brainly.com/question/25586322
#SPJ1
Answer:
awesome! happy pride month!
Explanation:
Answer: b
Explanation:
unless they’ve detained the suspect prior and have a reason to suspect he/she has these weapons or he gave them consent to enter and the weapons were in plain sight they wrongfully entered
Answer:
As a judge, you should be required to pick from a limited range of sentences for each offense.
Explanation:
Some may argue that having passed a difficult bar exam to be licensed to practice law, spending years prosecuting or defending criminal cases, and being involved in thousands of criminal trials should qualify a judge to be free to make any sentencing decision they want—but this notion is incorrect.
Although judges tend to be extremely experienced and highly intelligent, granting judges too much leeway in sentencing decisions leads to issues like sentencing disparity (disproportionate sentencing in similar cases). Before the passage of the Sentencing Reform Act (SRA) in 1984, sentencing disparities within the United States justice system were largely unaddressed, so the SRA sought to address sentencing disparities with the imposition of mandatory sentencing guidelines for federal sentences. However, the SRA limited the power of judges to a great extent, an issue that would be addressed in the <em>United States v. Booker</em> (2005) Supreme Court case, with the court ruling the sentencing guidelines imposed by the SRA be deemed advisory rather than mandatory. What can be learned from these legal developments is that sentencing guidelines are necessary for reducing disparity within the justice system, but should remain advisory so as to not place any excessive limitations on the authority or sentencing liberty of judges.
The closest answer to the Supreme Court's legal precedent—our ideal in this case—would be picking from a limited range of sentences for each offense rather than having no limitations at all, as the latter would likely result in a return to the non-uniform, disparity-ridden justice system seen before the passage of the SRA.
Answer:The more dumb the more need to understand
