Well, I don't know.
Let's figure it out together.
The best way to do that is to compare their unit rates:
The first woman's unit rate is (60 ft / 10 sec)
= (60 / 10) (ft/sec) = 6 ft/sec .
The second woman's unit rate is (25 ft / 5 sec)
= (25 / 5) (ft/sec) = 5 ft/sec .
Now we can see that the first woman walks 1 ft/sec faster
than the second one does.
Answer:
2.3 < x < 8.7
Step-by-step explanation:
Given 2 sides of a triangle then the 3rd side x is in the range
difference of 2 sides < x < sum of 2 sides , that is
5.5 - 3.2 < x < 5.5 + 3.2
2.3 < x < 8.7
Answer: Reject the eight- ounces claim.
Step-by-step explanation:
For left tailed test , On a normal curve the rejection area lies on the left side of the critical value.
It means that if the observed z-value is less than the critical value then it will fall into the rejection region other wise not.
As per given ,
Objective : A coffee-dispensing machine is supposed to deliver eight ounces of liquid or less.
Then ,
, since alternative hypothesis is left-tailed thus the test is an left-tailed test.
the critical value for z for a one-tailed test with the tail in the left end is -1.645 and the obtained value is -1.87.
Clearly , -1.87 < -1.645
⇒ -1.87 falls under rejection region.
⇒ Decision : Reject null hypothesis.
i.e. we reject the eight- ounces claim.
Answer:
2+2=4
Step-by-step explanation:
Thanks ig