Answer:
B. $6,448,519
Explanation:
The computation of the present value of this growing annuity is given below:
PVA = [Cash flow at year 1 ÷ (interest rate - growth rate)] × {1 - [(1 + growth rate) ÷ (1 + interest rate)^number of years}
= [$675,000 ÷ (0.18 - 0.13)] × [1 - (1.13 ÷ 1.18)^15]
= $6,448,519
Hence, the correct option is b.
The following makes notes receivable :
- Notes receivable are formal written contracts.
- Notes receivable have a stronger legal claim.
- Notes receivable are interest bearing.
<h3>What are Notes Receivable?</h3>
Notes receivable are a balance sheet item that records the value of promissory notes that a business is owed and should receive payment for. A written promissory note gives the holder, or bearer, the right to receive the amount outlined in the legal agreement. Promissory notes are a written promise to pay cash to another party on or before a specified future date.
If the note receivable is due within a year, then it is treated as a current asset on the balance sheet. If it is not due until a date that is more than one year in the future, then it is treated as a non-current asset on the balance sheet.
Often, a business will allow customers to convert their overdue accounts (the business’ accounts receivable) into notes receivable. By doing so, the debtor typically benefits by having more time to pay.
Learn more about Notes Receivable on:
brainly.com/question/26965875
#SPJ4
Answer:
With Yani's counter-wage offer, the insurance firm will likely reject his counter-offer and, in the extreme, withdraw the employment proposal with the firm.
Explanation:
As indicated in the question, the insurance company is a monopsony. A monopsony is the single buyer in the marketplace. This means that there is no other firm that can employ Yani in his Connecticut hometown. He must look for another job in another environment outside his hometown or condescend to accept the lower than hoped-for salary by the large insurance firm.
Answer:
C. To enforce property rights
Explanation:
Government intervention in market can be non materistically via regulation , materistically via taxes & subsidy.
Although the second materislistic way of tax, subsidy comes under the perview of 'Government Budget' .
Government budget is anual financial statement showing economy's expected revenue & expenditure .
Economic growth & stability by reallocation of resources , reducing income inequalities - reflect 'efficiency' & 'equity' as valid reasons .
Foreign protection is also not invalid depending upon the initial budding stage of a developing economy & its global stand. Eg - India 1950 to 1990 .
However all these are progressive legitimate reason for govt. Intervention .
But , enforcing property rights is a feature of 'socialistic (communistic) economy - which has its own demerits like loss of consumers soveireignity , lack of postive competitive efficiency , govt overburden.
Answer:
whether or not there are close substitutes for the products of the two firms
Explanation:
The law watches closely for mergers that actively seek to inhibit or totally annihilate competition in the market which will be harmful for consumers. Mergers such as horizontal mergers, vertical mergers tend to bring about a monopoly whereby sellers aim to coordinate in a such a way that there is an agreement amongst them and profit is ensured while market becomes less efficient.
