I believe it is A. Hope this helps.
Given rectangle RUTS, the missing reasons that justifies the five statements in the two-column proof are:
- Given
- Definition of rectangle.
- Definition of rectangle.
- By SAS Congruence Theorem.
- By CPCTC.
<h3>What is a Rectangle?</h3>
- A rectangle is a quadrilateral.
- All four angles in a rectangle are right angles.
- The opposite sides of a rectangle are parallel and congruent to each other.
Therefore, based on what we are given and the definition of a rectangle, we can establish that △URS ≅ △STU by SAS.
Since △URS ≅ △STU, therefore ∠USR = ∠SUT by CPCTC.
In conclusion, given rectangle RUTS, the missing reasons that justifies the five statements in the two-column proof are:
- Given
- Definition of rectangle.
- Definition of rectangle.
- By SAS Congruence Theorem.
- By CPCTC.
Learn more about properties of rectangle on:
brainly.com/question/2835318
Answer: they will each spend $6.75
Step-by-step explanation:
27/4 = 6.75
Answer:
75 degrees.
Step-by-step explanation:
The total number of degrees in a triangle is 180 degrees therefore you can take the sum of the other 2 angles in the triangle and take that number and subtract it from 180.
1). 30+75=105
2).180-105=75
3). using the Side, Side, Side geometry rule, this means that both triangles are the same for all angles and side lengths
4). using the Alternative angle rule, the rule that say that a line that intersects 2 parallel lines forms 4 pairs of similar angles
5). therefore angle ABC is the same as angle BCD
6). Angle ABC was determined to be 75 degrees therefore angle BCD is also 75 degrees
