Answer:
<h2>B. How groups of people are all totally different</h2>
Explanation:
<h2>Hopes this helps. Mark as brainlest plz!</h2>
The framers used compromise in order to increase the chances of the constitution being ratified. Each of the political factions developing during this time, the federalists and anti-federalists, had different things they wanted in terms of structuring American society.
The federalists wanted a new constitution and to get rid of the Articles of Confederation. The anti-federalists, wanted to simply amend the Articles of Confederation. However, the anti-federalists were open to a new constitution as long as it had a list of individual rights that the government could not take away.
The framers compromised and gave each side something they desired. The federalists would get a new constitution and the anti-federalists would get a list of rights they were guaranteed to have. This became known as the Bill of Rights.
Answer:
I think it is both good and bad in different capacities. It is bad because we are entering a costly and deadly war which we may potentially lose and if we do win it may come at great personal cost. However, it is also a good thing because an act of war has just been committed against us and it would make the US look weak if we did nothing in retaliation.
Explanation:
You may need to add more details and better words sorry if this isn't helpful!
Worried about overreaching power of the federal government.
George Mason supported the Articles of Confederation and thought a federal government would endanger individual rights granted by nature. He rallied in Virginia against ratification because he believed it would destroy the rights of the states and the people. Actions like his led to the passage of the Bill of Rights. <span />