1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
frosja888 [35]
3 years ago
12

How did Andrew Jackson justify the actions of the United States government in removing the Native

History
2 answers:
Andrej [43]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

The Cherokee went to the Supreme Court again in 1831. This time they based their appeal on an 1830 Georgia law which prohibited whites from living on Indian territory after March 31, 1831, without a license from the state. The state legislature had written this law to justify removing white missionaries who were helping the Indians resist removal. The court this time decided in favor of the Cherokee. It stated that the Cherokee had the right to self-government, and declared Georgia's extension of state law over them to be unconstitutional. The state of Georgia refused to abide by the Court decision, however, and President Jackson refused to enforce the law.

Explanation:

IgorLugansk [536]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

He declared that the only hope for the Southeastern tribes' survival would be for them to give up all their land and move west of the Mississippi River. Jackson warned the tribes that if they failed to move, they would lose their independence and fall under state laws. Jackson backed an Indian removal bill in Congress.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Why is the Code of Hammurabi such an important factor in the development of empires?
monitta

Answer:

I believe the answer is A

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
After the citizens of Gonzales started shooting make-shift ammunition from the cannon, Castaneda...
deff fn [24]

Answer:The Battle of Gonzales was the first military engagement of the Texas Revolution. It was fought near Gonzales, Texas, on October 2, 1835, between rebellious Texian settlers and a detachment of Mexican army soldiers.

In 1831, Mexican authorities lent the settlers of Gonzales a small cannon to help protect them from frequent Comanche raids. Over the next four years, the political situation in Mexico deteriorated, and in 1835 several states revolted. As the unrest spread, Colonel Domingo de Ugartechea, the commander of all Mexican troops in Texas, felt it unwise to leave the residents of Gonzales with a weapon and requested the return of the cannon.

When the initial request was refused, Ugartechea sent 100 dragoons to retrieve the cannon. The soldiers neared Gonzales on September 29, but the colonists used a variety of excuses to keep them from the town, while secretly sending messengers to request assistance from nearby communities. Within two days, up to 140 Texians gathered in Gonzales, all determined not to give up the cannon. On October 1, settlers voted to initiate a fight. Mexican soldiers opened fire as Texians approached their camp in the early hours of October 2. After several hours of desultory firing, the Mexican soldiers withdrew.[1]

Although the skirmish had little military significance, it marked a clear break between the colonists and the Mexican government and is considered to have been the start of the Texas Revolution. News of the skirmish spread throughout the United States, where it was often referred to as the "Lexington of Texas". The cannon's fate is disputed. It may have been buried and rediscovered in 1936, or it may have been seized by Mexican troops after the Battle of the Alamo.

Explanation:

I hope this helps :)

3 0
3 years ago
By the end of 1965 what was the status of most american soldiers answers
Umnica [9.8K]
For the answer to the question above,
<span>the status of most American soldiers answers </span><span>by the end of 1965 is that t<u><em>hey were draftees</em></u>. I hope this helped. Have a nice day!</span>
4 0
3 years ago
HELP ME AND ILL GIVE YOU 50 POINTS
Natali [406]

Answer:

because

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In the colonial era,developments such as the New England town meetings and the establishment of the Virginia house of burgesses
Nesterboy [21]

New England town meetings and the establishment of the Virginia house of burgesses represented the first efforts to create the American unity against the abuses of the British Empire. It was the organization of angry feelings against the lack or representatives, given that they only accepted being taxed by their own elected representatives. Those new establishments represented the weakening of the connecting between colonies and the Mother country (UK).

8 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • When did Barbara Jordan run for president?
    13·1 answer
  • The Security Council is made up of permanent members and <br> temporary members.
    14·2 answers
  • What was the second continental congress? why was this important to the colonist?
    8·1 answer
  • Marx wrote about his disagreement with the free enterprise system in: The Communist Manifesto Das Kapital The Prince The Tenure
    15·2 answers
  • How did militiamen let down the US troops during the invasion of Canada in the war of 1812?
    14·1 answer
  • The role of American women to educate children on democracy was called ______?
    13·1 answer
  • What is one verse from the Letter to the Philippians that speaks personally to you. Why does that verse speak to you?
    14·2 answers
  • What was the strategy that helped the Russians to defeat Napoleon and his armies?
    6·1 answer
  • Can someone please help me fast!!!
    9·1 answer
  • Vasco da Gama<br> Where did he explore , who was already living there ?
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!