Answer:
i think A emmm nonono, i think B is the answer, but C i think is a true too. and my answer is A, B, C, D
Answer:
Representative democracy
Explanation
Democracy can be divided into two:
- Direct democracy.
In this form of democracy, the citizens can influence the decisions made by the government by directly vote for the type of legislations that the government can pass. This form of democracy typically used in small communities that rarely face overly complicated issues.
- Representatives Democracy.
In this form of democracy, citizens canto vote for the legislations. But, they can select a group of officials in order to vote for the legislations on the citizens' behalf. This system democracy is what currently used the most in the world. Typically, this form of democracy is more efficient in a society with large populations with a lot of complicated issues (such as a country)
Answer:
The answer is a discontinuous view of child development.
Explanation:
Child development refers to the physical and emotional changes that a child experiences from birth to the beginning of adulthood. During this process, the child begins to acquire independence from his or her parents.
Genetic factors usually influence child development, as well as it is influenced by facts related to the environment and the child's capacity to learn. The fact of observing and supervising child development is an important aspect to ensure that children have "developmental milestones".
The question is incomplete. This is the complete question:
Which of the following is not a permissible circumstance under which to implement a prior restraint, under Near v. Minnesota?
a. obscene publications.
b. Fighting words likely to promote immense violence.
c. Obstruction of military recruitment.
d. Publication of troop movement in the time of war.
Answer:
The answer is b. Fighting words likely to promote immense violence.
Explanation:
Although it is possible for certain words to cause immense violence when used in publications, under Near v. Minnesota (a United States Supreme Court decision which declared that prior restraints on publication violated the freedom of speech and press) it is still not permissible to implement a prior restraint, even when publications use fighting words that are likely to promote immense violence.
