Double marginality
The suspicion that police officers of a racial or ethnic minority face from their white colleagues and from members of the minority community to which they belong is double marginality.
Double marginality is basically when a minority police officer is tougher on a minority suspect so people don't think he's being more lenient to people of his own race.
Law enforcement suggest that the agencies and employees are responsible for enforcing laws, maintaining public order, and managing public safety. The primary duties of law enforcement include the investigation, apprehension, and detention of individuals suspected of criminal offenses.
To know more about Law enforcement here
brainly.com/question/27896350
#SPJ4
I believe the answer is: russia
During his teens, Claude debussy had the opportunity to work with <span>wealthy patroness of </span>Pyotr Ilyich Tchaikovsky in Russia.
At that place, he acquired the taste of <span> ancient and oriental modes and for vivid coloration that exist in russian music</span>
Answer:
Very tough exams and assignments
Answer? 1) Yes, it is a bit ironic. If a company has an Ethics program that's comprehensive enough, executives should not have to be caught in business criminal activities.
2.) First let's talk about Ethics programs. These are basically programs that embody the business philosophies of a company such that every stakeholder understand how business is run in the company. It basically defines to employees, staff, investors, vendors and customers the rules of Business Ethics as defined by the firm, from the maximum amount of tips to collect from customers to how intimate employees get with clients so that there's no confusion. Now, all this is to clarify but the question here is how effective was the program if criminal activity was discovered? It's simple. The most comprehensive Ethics programs can't control human circumstantial behaviour. As clear as rules may be, they are always still broken. And this is because, with humans, there an infinite number of things to put into consideration, most of which won't always follow rules. One may be 100% compliant with said rules but find themselves weak to give in at some point for any possible reason the person deemed more important than upholding the companies ethics. In other words, these rules are held by the people it binds and the delivery will always be subjective. Whenever it is deemed unfavorable to uphold, it most likely will be dropped.
Therefore, it might have been the most effective and comprehensive Ethics program in the world but only as effective as the executives demmed it subjectively.
