Answer:
You’d be hard pressed to find someone who would disagree that American politics are highly partisan. Partisanship has been on the rise since the 1970s, and the consensus among the media seems to be that political polarization has skyrocketed since the beginning of the campaign season for the 2016 presidential election.
But a new study from the Annenberg School for Communication does not support this popular belief. Professor Yphtach Lelkes and his research collaborators conducted a series of studies in 2014 and then replicated these studies in 2017, allowing them to compare levels of political polarization in America before and after Donald Trump was elected president. They found no increase in polarization, leading them to conclude that Trump has not made things worse.
“I’ve been studying polarization for a long time,” Lelkes says, “and elite discourse is arguably at its worst, which led us to theorize that partisanship would be worse since Trump took office. But we found that things really have not budged.”
The first of the three studies tested participants’ willingness to speak poorly of the other political party and their opposition of speech critical of their own party. The second study tested the extent to which participants desired to avoid members of the opposite party, even when participating in activities that were not related to politics. And the third study tested participants’ willingness to commit or condone intentional actions designed to harm members of the opposing party.
These studies certainly indicate that America is politically polarized — evidenced by a preference for media critical of the other party rather than one’s own, among other things — but the findings show no statistical difference between the levels of partisanship in 2014 and 2017. America is no doubt polarized; just not more so than it was before Trump entered the political arena.
“Trump is a symptom of polarization rather than a cause of it,” says Lelkes. “People voted for him because of the highly polarized environment we already lived in; he didn’t create that environment.”
In fact, Lelkes’ findings actually indicate that there’s been a decrease in how positively Americans feel about their own party. Regular Americans are seemingly dissatisfied with both the party they identify with and the party they don’t identify with. And as elites — like policymakers and media personalities — become increasingly extreme and partisan, those regular Americans might decide they don’t want anything to do with either party, or with politics in general.
Explanation:
Answer:
Mindless decisions can cut down time that could be used for something else and overthinking starts to come into the equation as well and we will talk ourselves out of the decision all together.
Explanation:
A decision will become "mindless" if we repeat it often enough to the point where it become a hobbit. This actually could safe you a lot of time compared to putting a lot of thought
For example, let's say that you have to eat breakfast everyday on 7 PM.
If you make a rabbit of eating oatmeal with milk every single day, your body will mindlessly get that exact food every time at 7am. But if you don't you will have to spend a couple of minutes thinking about what breakfast you should eat today .
I’m pretty sure it’s Atlanta
Personality development is a<u> methodology for </u><u>strengthening</u><u> and </u><u>growing </u><u>one's personality</u>.
Personality is nothing more than the culmination of all of an individual's memories and life experiences. An individual's personality is also influenced by environmental variables, family history, socioeconomic situation, genetic traits and other circumstances. Additionally, personality affects our thoughts, beliefs, values and expectations. Our personality affects how we view other people.
An individual can cultivate their personality to help them feel confident and highly valued. This is known as personality development. One's communication abilities and worldview are thought to benefit from this as well. Due to personality development, people frequently acquire a positive outlook.
To know more about personality see:
brainly.com/question/17636115
#SPJ4
Answer:
Response to intervention
Explanation:
Response to intervention (RTI) is a strategy that is used by professionals to the children or students who faced a problem in learning some skills. They help students so they can get success in the classroom. This strategy is just not used on special children, it can be used by a teacher to help their students if they are facing some form in the classroom.
teacher can use the test to measure the progress of a child. This is introduced by the disability act in 2004. The team of RTI will seek the disability in a child and help them to improve in that specific area. This strategy has been used even then when a child has no learning disability in the classroom.
