Answer:
C. Logos
Explanation:
Gandhi was appealing to the logic in this sentence, for that reason, we can confirm that the rhetorical appeal that he used was the logos.
Logos means word, speech or reason. It is the use of reason and reasoning, whether inductive or deductive, to construct an argument. In persuasion, logos is the logical reasoning behind the speaker's statements. Logos refers to any attempt to appeal to the intellect, to logical arguments.
Answer:
He believes that all living things are important.
Explanation:
According to the excerpt from "Birdfoot's Grampa" by Joseph Bruchae, the author speaks about "leathery hands full of wet brown life" that are knee-deep in the summer grass to which the narrator smiled and said that they have places to go too.
When the author says "they have places to go to too", he means that he believes that all living things are important.
I saw on the internet, someone said that it was <span>"consistent support of the topic sentence".( someone else said that on openstudy.com)</span> You dont need to get off topic :) Let me know if this helped
Answer:
inspiring disgust and loathing; repugnant.
Explanation:
Oh boy I’m gonna try or help as best as I can. After reading the poem I think that the imagery of freedom would be death. In the poem he consistently talks about how he could have died but didn’t. So I think that death would be freedom because it would end all of his struggling/ pain/ troubles. He constantly talks about how freedom (death) is so close in his grasp but he never quite makes it, he never dies. So I think he has a lack of freedom because although he could do what ever he wanted (for example jump in the river or take an elevator to the top floor) he never had the freedom he WANTED he never had the freedom to end life when he wanted to. And once he realized that he never had that freedom he decided that “life was fine”. I’m not sure if that makes sense but I hope it helps. If this confuses you then you should probably just wait till someone else answers
