Answer:
<h3>The invention of gunpowder.</h3>
Explanation:
- The post classical era often called as post ancient period is the period between 6th century AD to 15th century AD. This period is also known as the medieval period and is known for the various discoveries and inventions made during this age.
- It was during the post classical era China invented the four greatest inventions of all time. They were the gunpowder, printing press, paper and compass.
- The invention of gunpowder changed the whole scenario of warfare. It had a very powerful impact on the ways of battles and warfare all over the world.
Third, the people wanted their sins to be forgiven, to go to heaven or to take back goods from the Holy Lands or because they had committed a crime and were forced by the church to go on a Crusade. And some people just went on Crusades for fun. Taking back Jerusalem was the main reason why Crusades occurred.
Answer:
The first option
Explanation:
The Union’s eventual victory in the Battle of Gettysburg would give the North a major morale boost and put a definitive end to Confederate General Robert E. Lee’s bold plan to invade the North. Widely viewed as a key turning point in the war, the battle would take on even more importance later that year, when President Abraham Lincoln traveled to Gettysburg to dedicate the battle field’s cemetery.
Answer:
C Inadmissible, because it is extrinsic evidence of a prior inconsistent statement on a collateral matter.
Explanation:
A defendant is on trial for robbing a liquor store. The store clerk testified that the defendant came into the store at about 11 p.m., pointed a black gun with a silver grip at him, and demanded that he give him all the money in the cash register. The clerk testified that the store was well lit and that the defendant was not wearing a mask. The defendant's attorney called the clerk's employer to testify that when the clerk gave her a report of the robbery, he told her that the defendant pointed a silver gun with a black grip at him.
How should the trial judge rule on the admissibility of this testimony?
The evidence should not be accepted by the Judge. if the the earlier statement is contrary, it is not a enough to dismiss the witness.(A) and (B) are incorrect because, The clerk may be reliable or not. The evidence she provided is not enough to prosecute the defendant. she might not be totally correct in the reporting of the situation and might leave the judge confused. (D) is not correct