The "Washington" in this question, of course, is Booker T. Washington, an African-American leader. Washington advocated gradualism. That meant being patient and doing what white society would allow, which meant changes and better times for blacks would come slowly.
A different point of view was taken by another leader in the black community: W.E.B. DuBois. Dubois noted that Washington's approach was not accomplishing any real gains for blacks. He also felt that Washington's point of view showed acceptance of the racial inferiority of blacks. Plus he saw that institutions in the black community were being dominated by persons like Washington, rather than really empowering all individuals for themselves.
DuBois argued that all black citizens should have the right to vote, equality as citizens, and access to education according to their abilities.
Answer:
A: They had no written language, so there was no way to preserve the information.
Explanation:
Answer:
In the Roman Republic, there were two classes - patricians and plebeians. Patricians had full authority, which plebeians didn't accepted. They fought for their rights, and gained them. That is why Roman Republic transformed in total.
Explanation:
Patricians were wealthy landowners who were bringing all major decisions. Plebeians who were mostly poor wanted some type of representative in the government. They retreated from the city, thus making patricians to accept some of their requests. Among the other things, they could vote, enter the Senate, even take the role of consuls.
The Reign Of Terror was Robespierre’s system of killing ANYONE with anti-revolution acts. He even had his closest teammate, George Danton, beheaded. This was caused by the Third Estate wanting equality with the nobles and clergy. Although, after the French Revolution, Napoleon took over and turned France into an empire. Based on this information, the best answer would be C.
This is literary the show of power. Bismarck, by ignoring both the parliament and the constitution of the nation, undermined their authority which led to the weakening of the institution. Bismarck was though adapt at manipulating not only the government but also the public opinion of the masses through corrupt journalists and newspapers.
