Describe what is being done in each step while solving the equation. Match each step with the correct description. HINT: Start w
ith “Original Equation” as the first step.
1 answer:
You might be interested in
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Domain of f: "What values of x can we plug into this equation?" This makes sense for all real numbers so the domain is
Range of f: "What values of f(x) can we get out of the function?" From the graph we see we can get any real number greater than 0 out of the function by choosing a suitable x-value in the domain. The range is therefore .
Continuity: Since the graph is one, unbroken curve (i.e. a curve that can be drawn in one movement without taking your pen off the paper). We see that "roughly speaking" the function is continuous.
Increasing or decreasing behaviour: For all x in the domain, as x increases, f(x) decreases. This means the function exhibits decreasing behaviour.
Symmetry: It is clear to see the graph of f(x) has no symmetry.
Boundedness: Looking at the graph we see it is unbounded above as when we choose negative values, the graph of f(x) explodes upwards exponentially. Choose a value of x, plug it in, next choose (x-1), plug this in and we observe for all x in the domain.
The function is however bounded below by 0: no value of x in the domain exists which satisfies .
Extrema: As far as I can tell, there are no turning points on the curve. (Is this what you mean by extrema?)
Asymptotes: Contrary to the curve's appearance, there are no vertical asymtotes for this curve. The negative-x portion of the curve is just growing so quickly it appears to look like an asymptote. There is a value of f(x) for all x<0. There is however a horizontal asymtote: .
End behaviour: As . As
Answer:
There is not sufficient evidence to support the claim that the technique performs differently than the traditional method.
Step-by-step explanation:
The null hypothesis is:
The alternate hypotesis is:
The test statistic is:
In which X is the sample mean, is the value tested at the null hypothesis,
is the standard deviation and n is the size of the sample.
A researcher used the technique with 260 students and observed that they had a mean of 94 hours. Assume the standard deviation is known to be 6.
This means, respectively, that
The test-statistic is:
The pvalue is:
2(P(Z < -2.69))
P(Z < -2.69) is the pvalue of Z when X = -2.69, which looking at the z-table, is 0.0036
2*(0.0036) = 0.0072
0.0072 < 0.01, which means that the null hypothesis is accepted, that is, there is not sufficient evidence to support the claim that the technique performs differently than the traditional method.
Answer:
A.
Step-by-step explanation:
Plugging these coordinates into the system of equations will give you these genuine statements:
☑
I am joyous to assist you anytime.