Answer:
3 bags per weekday
Step-by-step explanation:
Total bags of leaves at the end of the week = 26 bags
Bags of leaves she fills over the weekend = 11 bags
Bags of leaves she fills during weekdays = x bags
Total bags of leaves at the end of the week = Bags of leaves she fills over the weekend + Bags of leaves she fills during weekdays
26 = 11 + x
Subtract 11 from both sides
26 - 11 = 11 - 11 + x
15 = x
x = 15 bags
If she fills the same number of bags with leaves on each of the 5 weekdays.
how many bags she filled each weekday.
Bags she filled each weekday = Total Bags of leaves she fills during weekdays / 5 weekdays
= 15 bags / 5 weekdays
= 3 bags per weekday
Answer:
The proof contains a simple direct proof, wrapped inside the unnecessary logical packaging of a proof by contradiction framework.
Step-by-step explanation:
The proof is rigourous and well written, so we discard the second answer.
This is not a fake proof by contradiction: it does not have any logical fallacies (circular arguments) or additional assumptions, like, for example, the "proof" of "All the horses are the same color". It is factually correct, but it can be rewritten as a direct proof.
A meaningful proof by contradiction depends strongly on the assumption that the statement to prove is false. In this argument, we only this assumption once, thus it is innecessary. Other proofs by contradiction, like the proof of "The square root of 2 is irrational" or Euclid's proof of the infinitude of primes, develop a longer argument based on the new assumption, but this proof doesn't.
To rewrite this without the superfluous framework, erase the parts "Suppose that the statement is false" and "The fact that the statement is true contradicts the assumption that the statement is false. Thus, the assumption that the statement was false must have been false. Thus, the statement is true."
Answer:
A y= -3/4+6
Step-by-step explanation
I hope this helps good luck
I'm 100% sure
Good luck god bless you pass have a nice day
I’m not sure, you’re not elaborating enough to this equation. Are you sure you’re not missing a phrase of some sort?
