Based on the selling price and the variable costs, the new contribution margin ratio would be<u> 35%.</u>
<h3>What would be the new contribution margin ratio?</h3>
First find the new contribution margin which is:
= Selling price - Variable cost
Solving gives:
= 200 - ( (60% x 200) + 10)
= 200 - (120 +10)
= $70
The contribution margin ratio will be:
= Contribution margin / Selling price
= 70/ 200
= 35%
Find out more on contribution margin at brainly.com/question/24881206.
The differences between saving and investing are:
Money can more easily be withdrawn when money is saved than when money is invested.
There is little or no risk of loss of money when money is saved. Money can be lost when invested.
My advice to Katrina would be to save her gift.
<h3>Why should Katrina save her money? </h3>
Katrina needs her money in the short term. Thus, it is better to save because it would be easier to withdraw her account from a savings account when compared to an investment account.
Money that should be invested should be money you don't mind losing. This is due to the risk associated with investing. Katrina needs the money to pay for her school expenses. This makes investing an impractical idea.
To learn more about investing, please check: To learn more about treasury notes please check: brainly.com/question/26164549
Answer:
A reduction of $12,500 in net operating income
Explanation:
The net operating income/loss is the difference between the sales and the total costs.
The change in the company's net operating income is the net of the increased commission and the total decrease in salaries. The commission is a variable cost that is dependent on the total number of units sold.
Hence the overall effect on the company's monthly net operating income of this change
= $46,000 - ($9 * 6500)
= ($12,500)
We need to see the article to give the best answer, but the closest choice would be <u>D.</u>
Giving both sides of the story is one way to avoid bias (aka favoring) toward one side.
Answer: a. is not subject to federal income tax and so these bonds pay a lower interest rate than otherwise comparable bonds issued by the U.S. government
Explanation:
Federal income taxes are the taxes that are used in the provision of national programs like settling national debt, infrastructural development, national defense, law enforcement etc.
If an individual owns bonds that are issued by the city of Sacramento, California, it should be noted that the interest that is earned each year on these bonds is not subject to federal income tax and so these bonds pay a lower interest rate than otherwise comparable bonds issued by the U.S. government. Comparable bonds that are being issued by the United States government pay an higher interest.