Answer: because it was good land and it was good for crops and cash crops and fishing and good for stuff for good settlements I think but who are you talking about? that would be my answer
Explanation: hope it helps
Answer:
the first one astoria and clatsop
Explanation:
There is a strong correlation between the nature of social class and <em>social inequality</em>.
The stratification of <em>social classes</em> not only depend on wealth, but also on factors like education and a person's occupation. This means that people in the same social class, besides being in the same range of wealth, also share the same lifestyle and similar social honors from others.
<em>Social inequality</em> occurs when the sole distribution of wealth is unequal among all of the members of a given society.
Wealth is a powerful factor that enables a person to achieve a better education and eventually escalate to upper social classes. This is where social inequality relates with the nature of social classes.
Answer:
D) does not; people have rational expectations
Explanation:
Philips short-run curve is a curve which shows the relationship between unemployment and inflation in any given country. This thoery was discovered by Professor A.W.Phillips which was based on observations he made of unemployment and changes in wage levels from 1861 to 1957 in which he found that there was a trade-off between unemployment and inflation.
<em>The argument was that, it does not represent a usable trade-off due to the fact that policy makers have a simple choice to make - to either accept the lowering of inflation or unemployment. </em>
<em> </em>