Answer:
Among the options given on the question the correct answer is option B.
The court has a duty to protect student's right to free speech.
Explanation: Based on the situation if a person agree to the dissenting opinion in this case would support that court has a duty protect the student's right for freedom of speech.
Because censoring the student's speech regarding on any issue violates the right of a citizen's freedom of speech. Like on the name of teaching moral and political value if the conversation of the students is stifled then it is the violation of their right.
Because the state can not enact any law which is violating the freedom of speech. If it happens in any case the court has the duty to make sure the freedom of speech of the student.Because the court can intercept the law.
This treaty formally ended the Seven Years' War and marked the beginning of an era of British dominance outside Europe.
Great Britain and France each returned much of the territory that they had captured during that war, but Britain gained much of France's possessions in North America. Spain ceded Florida to Britain.
I would say the benefits would be for example the right to vote in elections, the right to avail themselves of economic opportunities, the right to a higher education and the right to travel freely around the US and the right to form communities of similar ethnic and historical background such as the Latinamericans in the San Fernando Valley.,
One thing that <span> Commodore Matthew Perry's visits to Japan in 1853 and 1854 and the Open Door policy of 1900 had in common was that they were both meant to put international pressure on foreign nations--with the intent of opening up advantageous trade routes and relationships for the United States. </span>
