Answer:
ending work in process and the cost of units transferred out.
Explanation:
In a cost reconciliation schedule, costs accounted for is computed by adding the cost of the ending work in process and the cost of units transferred out.
The cost reconciliation schedule gives the relationship between total costs accounted for and total costs to be accounted for.
When the total costs accounted for equal the total costs to be accounted for, this is a cost reconciliation schedule.
Answer:
Explanation:
The Proposed bargain or deal is supportive of the business visionaries instead of the financial backer(investor) since all the capital is coming from the financial backer and the investor will be receiving just only 25% for the bargain or deal while he faces all the challenges posed or loss of capital. The business visionaries are not placing in any of their own personal capital but only their idea. They likewise have a bigger say in the administration of the business and the financial backer has no power over the choice since he conveys just 25% votes. Consequently, it's not a good bargain or deal for the financial backer considering the risk-reward ratio.
The counter-offer will include raising a proposed equity percent rate to half (i.e 50%). In addition to that, the financial backer needs to demand another seat on the board with the goal that they have equivalent authority over the administration and its choices. The most reduced the financial backer can go down is equity of 40% stake.
Answer:
Yes, it is worth $4 to insure a Personal Digital Assistant
Explanation:
Eery action has its benefits and disadvantage. The benefits of sending your cousins a Personal Digital Assistant mail is of great benefit to him. Therefore, if the chances of losing it to damage or lost is two percent, whereas with four percent, the damage or lost is covered and insured. Then the later becomes inevitable.
Evaluating it further it is better to lose additional charges for a set purpose, than to lose its capita l values .
Answer:
An increase in your income causes you to buy more hamburgers.
Explanation:
An increase in your income causes you to buy more hamburgers.
Option "A" is correct because the increase in income exhibits an increase in purchasing power. Moreover, there is a positive relationship between the income the demand for normal goods which means if the income rises, then the demand rises. If the income falls, then demand for goods also falls. Therefore, option "a" is right.