1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
weeeeeb [17]
3 years ago
5

Imagine that you travelled to a particular place. Write a descriptive recount of your visit. Do not give details of the journey.

Simply write your recount of the place that describes the place, its weather and the feeling it gave you. Use of uncommon vocabulary would be appreciated.
English
1 answer:
8_murik_8 [283]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

Explanation:

Leaving a region where I have dwelled for over two decades will always be eventful. It is something I have always savored even before it's actual occurrence. The day approached and finally came when I was posted to characteristically different settlement sandwiched between hills and very high plateaus. I could feel the difference as we approached, with a significantly lower celcius temperature, the weather was the most evident difference felt aside the physical geography which was very apparent. I have always boasted that I can't take a hot bath no matter the weather, which I have always upheld. It didn't take long to overturn my stance though as I couldn't have a face wash without having my water boiled. Furthermore, it was an entirely social setting characterized by a significantly smaller population even within the capital city with very little distance between landmarks. In general, it was initially an entirely strange feeling which seemed so different. However, it didn't take long to acclimatize which played a role in my ability to appreciate and respect the cultural and social values of different regions.

You might be interested in
Paraphrase Madison’s premise in these lines. Why is this a premise and not a claim? The Federalist No
nikdorinn [45]

Answer:

Summary

Madison begins perhaps the most famous of the Federalist papers by stating that one of the strongest arguments in favor of the Constitution is the fact that it establishes a government capable of controlling the violence and damage caused by factions. Madison defines factions as groups of people who gather together to protect and promote their special economic interests and political opinions. Although these factions are at odds with each other, they frequently work against the public interest, and infringe upon the rights of others.

Both supporters and opponents of the plan are concerned with the political instability produced by rival factions. The state governments have not succeeded in solving this problem; in fact, the situation is so problematic that people are disillusioned with all politicians and blame government for their problems. Consequently, a form of popular government that can deal successfully with this problem has a great deal to recommend it.

Given the nature of man, factions are inevitable. As long as men hold different opinions, have different amounts of wealth, and own different amount of property, they will continue to fraternize with people who are most similar to them. Both serious and trivial reasons account for the formation of factions but the most important source of faction is the unequal distribution of property. Men of greater ability and talent tend to possess more property than those of lesser ability, and since the first object of government is to protect and encourage ability, it follows that the rights of property owners must be protected. Property is divided unequally, and, in addition, there are many different kinds of property. and men have different interests depending upon the kind of property they own. For example, the interests of landowners differ from those who own businesses. Government must not only protect the conflicting interests of property owners but must, at the same time, successfully regulate the conflicts between those with and without property.

To Madison, there are only two ways to control a faction: to remove its causes and to control its effects. The first is impossible. There are only two ways to remove the causes of a faction: destroy liberty or give every citizen the same opinions, passions, and interests. Destroying liberty is a "cure worse then the disease itself," and the second is impracticable. The causes of factions are thus part of the nature of man and we must deal with their effects and accept their existence. The government created by the Constitution controls the damage caused by such factions.

The framers established a representative form of government, a government in which the many elect the few who govern. Pure or direct democracies (countries in which all the citizens participate directly in making the laws) cannot possibly control factious conflicts. This is because the strongest and largest faction dominates, and there is no way to protect weak factions against the actions of an obnoxious individual or a strong majority. Direct democracies cannot effectively protect personal and property rights and have always been characterized by conflict.

If the new plan of government is adopted, Madison hopes that the men elected to office will be wise and good men,­ the best of America. Theoretically, those who govern should be the least likely to sacrifice the public good to temporary condition, but the opposite might happen. Men who are members of particular factions, or who have prejudices or evil motives might manage, by intrigue or corruption, to win elections and then betray the interests of the people. However, the possibility of this happening in a large country, such as the United States, is greatly reduced. The likelihood that public office will be held by qualified men is greater in large countries because there will be more representatives chosen by a greater number of citizens. This makes it more difficult for the candidates to deceive the people. Representative government is needed in large countries, not to protect the people from the tyranny of the few, but to guard against the rule of the mob.

3 0
3 years ago
Which answer choice correctly completes the sentence?
givi [52]
They're. They are driving to Yellowstone National Park tomorrow. Theirs doesn't sound right in the sentence. Their means belonging to. So they're fits in the sentence the best.
5 0
3 years ago
Which of the following is a correctly written book citation?
LUCKY_DIMON [66]
A. (Jennings 88). 

Jennings is the last name of the author and 88 is the page number this is how you can write a citation







7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Please help no links
Darina [25.2K]

Answer: brainlist pls and thank you

Explanation:

Cotton gin. Gets rid of seeds 50 times faster.

Postitive effect: thought if would decreased the need for slaves.

negative effect: cotton gin incresed the need for slaves

steam engine: gives engery and better transport by taking water and steam and converting it to engery.

postitive effect: don’t need to be near water also increased better transportation

negative effect: can blow up and cost a lot.

8 0
3 years ago
“Into his handsome face the bitter waters of captivity had worn; but, he covered up their tracks with a determination so strong,
ivann1987 [24]
The lines "the bitter waters of captivity had worn" show how the doctor has been through many tough situations and problems, but the lines "<span>he covered up their tracks with a determination </span>" show how he does not want to show how much he actually has been throught. Hope it helped :)
4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Write narratives to develop real or imagined experiences or events using effective technique, well-chosen details, and well-stru
    15·2 answers
  • The problem in the italicized element in the sentence below is
    13·1 answer
  • What is the meaning of poem "Ingrid Jonker"
    9·1 answer
  • Figurative meaning involves which two traits? Select two answers.(1 point)
    8·1 answer
  • What does the heading "Scene 1" tell the reader? A) That the play only contains one scene. B) That there will be many complicate
    9·2 answers
  • Part A Which statement best states a central idea in the text about children of immigrants? They decide whether to portray stori
    5·1 answer
  • Write a compare-and-contrast analysis to compare the way two different texts present similar ideas.
    5·1 answer
  • Please help ASAP!!!
    13·2 answers
  • Part A in picture
    7·2 answers
  • What are the purposes of King's allusions?
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!