Answer:
Not good at math
Explanation:
Have an amazing day and know people don’t usually say these thing it’s a great website I just need a +5 so I don’t have to watch the ads❤️
Answer:
A.admissible as habit evidence
Explanation:
A passenger of Dan sustained injuries and filed a lawsuit against him. The passenger( plaintiff) presented someone to testify about how Dan has a bad reputation for reckless driving in the community.
This testimony by White would most likely be admissible in the court of law because Dan already has a bad reputation of the action he’s been charged with in his community.This makes it admissible as habit evidence.
Good luck on your work!! <3
Answer:
The answers are <u>cognitive conflict</u> and <u>affective conflict</u>
Explanation:
In any organization, be it family, work, sports team, etc., conflict are very common. There are two main different types of conflict that can arise: Task-related, or cognitive conflict; and relationship, or affective conflict. Cognitive conflict generally refers to differences between how to best perform an activity, how to achieve a goal, or the best course of action. Affective conflict, on the other hand, refers to personal differences between the involved parties, which lead to negative emotional responses.
In your example, this can be seen very clearly: differences between you and the owner were over differences in judgement, but deteriorated to the point where they are more emotional and directed personally toward one another. It thus can be said that you initially experienced <u>cognitive conflict</u>, but now are experiencing <u>affective conflict</u>.
Answer:
their acquired expertise is such an automatic habit that if feels like Intuiton
Explanation:
Intuition is the ability to access unconscious reasoning to reach a conclusion. Intuitive people feel like they know things without necessarily understanding way. In this example, the controllers have seen so many flight patterns, and their expertise is so great, thay they can tell the flight pattern of a plane without effort.
Another example would an experienced lawyer who hears for a few minutes the story of a client, and knows immediately if the case can be won or not even if he has not learned the details of the case yet.
