This behavior is called "<span>Passive Aggression".</span>
Passive<span>-aggressiveness, as is obvious
from the term itself, refers to an inclination where someone engages in a
discourse where they do not use the direct expressions to show their hostility
rather an indirect course is taken by means of insults and planned failures to
do the required jobs etc. </span>
Answer:At home he did not want people to have political divisions. He said it might turn things violent. His foreign policy stated he did not want to get into Britain's mess.
Explanation:
I think it’s “The presence of all the traits of civilization”
<u>Social disorganization theory</u> can help explain crimes committed by individuals who develop and spread computer viruses.
Social process theories like differential reinforcement theory and learning theory can be used to explain why people who create and propagate computer viruses commit crimes. The ability to write a virus requires a certain amount of technical proficiency. Learning how to write the code required to create a virus is frequently part of this process. Many people learn these skills through message boards, or distance learning instead of in-person instruction, which is the case in the majority of cases. This kind of action also has positive reinforcements, such as the thrill of spreading the virus and infecting systems, "admiration" from one's peer group, and potential financial gains.
According to this theoretical viewpoint, criminal behaviour may be related to missed possibilities for respectable pursuits. As a result, those who engage in this kind of criminal activity could be referred to as "innovators" because they employ unethical methods to achieve the conventional aim of success, which is typically quantified in terms of financial gain. It's interesting to note that Merton first used this theoretical viewpoint to explain why legitimate chances for those who are primarily from the lower class were obstructed.
To learn more about Social disorganization theory here,
brainly.com/question/6346997
#SPJ4
<u>Marginal Costs & Marginal benefits in a choice you made.</u>
Assume that I want to buy an ornament for hands. I spend $500 for purchasing an ornament. When I was supposed to see another I wish to buy that. But spending again for the ornaments also not a good idea. I am also not willing in spending $500 for the ornament. So, I decided to go for an ornament that costed only $250. No, my marginal benefit get decreased from $500 to $250. When I decided to go fro the second one or more than one of same good my marginal benefits decrease.
Marginal cost is something that changes in a smaller range in the production of one additional unit. For example I decide to manufacture 500 pens. i need raw materials for the production and a building and machine for production. The change in the cost or expenses that happens when I decide to produce 600 pens is the marginal cost.