Biological determinism is a canard that has repeatedly been explained away by evolutionary informed scientists since time immemorial. Humans are an inextricable mix of their genes and their environments. As a matter of fact, genes get turned on or off as a function of environmental inputs. Evolutionary-based cognitive computational systems take information from the environment to get activated. Natural selection itself, the foundational mechanism of evolution, is shaped by the selective forces within a specific environment. Hence, there is no such thing as biological determinism.
<em>The answers are:</em>
1. <u>Zerubbabel
</u>
Leader under whom the second temple was built
<em>Ezra 5:2
</em>
2. <u>Shiloh </u>
First place where tabernacle rested in Canaan
<em>Joshua 18:1</em> <em>(In Gilgal the Bible doesn't say anything about the Tabernacle)
</em>
3. <u>Gibeon</u>
Location of tabernacle during David's reign
<em>1 Chronicles 21:29
</em>
4. <u>Mount Zion</u>
Place where ark was set within curtains
<em>2 Samuel 6:2;16
</em>
5. <u>City of david</u>
Another name for the city of Jerusalem
<em>2 Samuel 5:7
</em>
6. <u>Nob</u>
Second place where tabernacle rested in canaan
<em>1 Samuel 21:1-9
</em>
7. <u>Nazarite</u>
Man or woman who took a vow of separation
<em>Numbers 6:2
</em>
8. <u>Ithamar</u>
Son of Aaron who ministered in the priest's office
<em>Numbers 3:4
</em>
9. <u>Aaron</u>
Crown was inscribed "holiness to the lord"
<em>Exodus 28:36
</em>
10. <u>Nadab</u>
Aaron's first-born son
<em>Numbers 3:2</em>
Answer : George Brinton McClellan was an American soldier, civil engineer, railroad executive, and politician.
Explanation:
The first part cited the following arguments in favour of changing the form of government: All people are created equal and that they have the right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness; To ensure these rights, people create Governments with the consent of those who govern them; The right of people to abolish decisions of state. Structures and displacement, the abolition of the structures themselves.
The second part of the declaration said: The King of England is a usurper, criticizing the organization of power from the standpoint of the doctrine of separation of powers: The King has placed judges in exceptional dependence on his will, the King seeks to make military power Independent from the civil and put the first above the second, the main conclusion was that the King is not able to govern the free people.
The Dred Scott decision, or lawsuit as you put it, was a case where it was stated by the court that people of African descent could not be American citizens and had no standing in court. They, whether free or not, had no power to regulate slavery in the United States. His rights have been violated for many reasons. He was accused of standing in court for just being black. It was very unconstitutional and found by many historians as one of the worst Supreme Court decisions ever made.
