Hello, the answer to your question about which of these sentences contains both a <em>participle</em> and an <em>infinitive</em>, is the second option:
- <em>2. Kevin's parents </em><u><em>decided</em></u><em> </em><u><em>to increase</em></u><em> the punishment.</em>
<u><em>decided</em></u> is the past participle of the verb <em>'decide'</em>
<em><u>to increase</u></em> is the full infinitive of the verb <em>'increase'</em>
Hope this helps!
Pretty sure it's [sarcastic] haven't checked for sure
Answer:
Ali said that she had not played yesterday .
Answer:
No, legislation on wiretapping is not a violation of the Fourth Amendment and Orwell's vision of Big Brother.
Explanation:
Technically, Wiretapping acts would not infringe the Fourth Amendment as wiretapping is not regarded as search and seizure, which would entail a physical search of the property and belongings of an individual. Moreover, it established your Fourth Amendment rights extend only to one's physical property and not to communications or other non-tangible items, and because the people involved are not forced to reveal incriminating details.
However, the interference of NSA in the privacy of people which is mentioned in Orwell’s is a subjective interpretation and therefore needs to be seen in that context.
