All categories

3 years ago

4

Mathematics

1 answer:

Ede4ka [16]3 years ago

3 0

Answer:

Temperature in °F = 160°F

Step-by-step explanation:

Temperature can be defined as a measure of the degree of coldness or hotness of a physical object. It is measured with a thermometer and its units are Celsius (°C), Kelvin (K) and Fahrenheit (°F).

Given the following data;

Temperature in Celsius = 25°C

To convert celsius to fahrenheit, we would use the following formula;

Temperature in °F = (5 x temperature in °C + 32°)

Substituting into the formula, we have;

Temperature in °F = (5 x 25 + 32°)

Temperature in °F = (125 + 32°)

Temperature in °F = 157

To the nearest 10°F;

Temperature in °F = 160°F

You might be interested in

MY RECENT QUESTION IS WORTH 47 POINTS! JUST CLICK ON MY PROFILE AND GO TO QUESTIONS TO ANSWER IT PLEASE!!!!!!!

Irina18 [472]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

5 0

3 years ago

Enter the expression N0e−λt, where N0 is N-naught (an N with a subscript zero) and λ is the lowercase Greek letter lambda.

Natali5045456 [20]

So the question tells to express the expression in your problem where N0 is N-naught and the symbol represent the lower case Greek letter lambda. So the best answer or expression would be that the lambda is the wavelength of the expression. I hope you are satisfied with my answer

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Is the quotient of 9 rational

Musya8 [376]

Yes the quotient of 9 is rational

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

A. Do some research and find a city that has experienced population growth.

horrorfan [7]

A. The city we will use is Orlando, Florida, and we are going to examine its population growth from 2000 to 2010. According to the census the population of Orlando was 192,157 in 2000 and 238,300 in 2010. To examine this population growth period, we will use the standard population growth equation $N_{t} =N _{0}e^{rt}$
where:
$N(t)$ is the population after $t$ years
$N_{0}$ is the initial population
$t$ is the time in years
$r$ is the growth rate in decimal form
$e$ is the Euler's constant
We now for our investigation that $N(t)=238300$ , $N_{0} =192157$ , and $t=10$ ; lets replace those values in our equation to find $r$ :
$238300=192157e^{10r}$
$e^{10r} = \frac{238300}{192157}$
$ln(e^{10r} )=ln( \frac{238300}{192157} )$
$r= \frac{ln( \frac{238300}{192157}) }{10}$
$r=0.022$
Now lets multiply $r$ by 100% to obtain our growth rate as a percentage:
$(0.022)(100)$ =2.2%
We just show that Orlando's population has been growing at a rate of 2.2% from 2000 to 2010. Its population increased from 192,157 to 238,300 in ten years.

B. Here we will examine the population decline of Detroit, Michigan over a period of ten years: 2000 to 2010.
Population in 2000: 951,307
Population in 2010: 713,777
We know from our investigation that $N(t)=713777$ , $N_{0} =951307$ , and $t=10$ . Just like before, lets replace those values into our equation to find $r$ :
$713777=951307e^{10r}$
$e^{10r} = \frac{713777}{951307}$
$ln(e^{10r} )=ln( \frac{713777}{951307} )$
$r= \frac{ln( \frac{713777}{951307}) }{10}$
$r=-0.029$
$(-0.029)(100)$ = -2.9%.
We just show that Detroit's population has been declining at a rate of 2.2% from 2000 to 2010. Its population increased from 192,157 to 238,300 in ten years.

C. Final equation from point A: $N(t)=192157e^{0.022t}$ .
Final equation from point B: $N(t)=951307e^{-0.029t}$
Similarities: Both have an initial population and use the same Euler's constant.
Differences: In the equation from point A the exponent is positive, which means that the function is growing; whereas, in equation from point B the exponent is negative, which means that the functions is decaying.

D. To find the year in which the population of Orlando will exceed the population of Detroit, we are going equate both equations $N(t)=192157e^{0.022t}$ and $N(t)=951307e^{-0.029t}$ and solve for t:
$192157e^{0.022t} =951307e^{-0.029t}$
$\frac{192157e^{0.022t} }{951307e^{-0.029t} } =1$
$e^{0.051t} = \frac{951307}{192157}$
$ln(e^{0.051t})=ln( \frac{951307}{192157})$
$t= \frac{ln( \frac{951307}{192157}) }{0.051}$
$t=31.36$
We can conclude that if Orlando's population keeps growing at the same rate and Detroit's keeps declining at the same rate, after 31.36 years in May of 2031 Orlando's population will surpass Detroit's population.

E. Since we know that the population of Detroit as 2000 is 951307, twice that population will be $2(951307)=1902614$ . Now we can rewrite our equation as: $N(t)=1902614e^{-0.029t}$ . The last thing we need to do is equate our Orlando's population growth equation with this new one and solve for t:
$192157e^{0.022t} =1902614e^{-0.029t}$
$\frac{192157e^{0.022t} }{1902614e^{-0.029t} } =1$
$e^{0.051t} = \frac{1902614}{192157}$
$ln(e^{0.051t} )=ln( \frac{1902614}{192157} )$
$t= \frac{ln( \frac{1902614}{192157}) }{0.051}$
$t=44.95$
We can conclude that after 45 years in 2045 the population of Orlando will exceed twice the population of Detroit.

8 0

3 years ago

In 2010, the world's largest pumpkin weighed 1,810 kilograms. An average-sized pumpkin weighs 5,000 grams.

jekas [21]

Answer:

1,805 kg.

Step-by-step explanation:

We have been given that in 2010, the world's largest pumpkin weighed 1,810 kilograms. An average-sized pumpkin weighs 5,000 grams. We are asked to find the how much the world's largest pumpkin weighs than an average pumpkin.

First of all, we will convert the weight of average pumpkin in kilograms by dividing 5,000 by 1000 as 1 kg equals 1,000 gm.

$\text{The weight of average pumpkin}=\frac{5000\text{ gm}}{\frac{\text{1000 gm}}{\text{ 1 kg}}}$

$\text{The weight of average pumpkin}=5000\text{ gm}\times \frac{\text{ 1 kg}}{\text{1000 gm}}$

$\text{The weight of average pumpkin}=5\text{ kg}$

Now, we will subtract the weight of average pumpkin from world's largest pumpkin's weight.

$1,810\text{ kilograms}-5\text{ kilograms}=1,805\text{ kilograms}$

Therefore, the 2010 world-record pumpkin weighs 1,805 kilograms more than an average-sized pumpkin.

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers