1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
jek_recluse [69]
3 years ago
8

If Missouri came into the nation (United States = Union) as a free state, what would happen to the balance of power in the Senat

e?
History
2 answers:
Alla [95]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

I think what will happen if Missouri was not free, the free states would secede.

Explanation:

mihalych1998 [28]3 years ago
3 0
The balance would be uneven, since there was an balanced number of free states and slave states (12 each I believe) in order for Missouri to become a slave state, Maine had to admit itself as a free state to keep the balance, this is known as the Missouri compromise.
You might be interested in
Which statement best explains financial crises in the global economy?
lilavasa [31]

Which statement best explains financial crises in the global economy?

"A financial crisis in one country can quickly spread to other countries."

A financial crisis in the global economy refers to breaking trust between banks and deep stress in global financial markets. For example, a downturn that starts in the United States will soon spread to the rest of the world, through linkages in the global

financial system. So many banks around the world will have significant losses and will depend on their government that supports them to avoid bankruptcy.

4 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Who maintains American neutrality
Ket [755]

Answer:

The Embargo Act.

Jefferson's solution to the problems with Great Britain and France was to deny both countries American goods. In December 1807, Congress passed the Embargo Act, which stopped exports and prohibited the departure of merchant ships for foreign ports.

Explanation:

The Proclamation of Neutrality was a formal announcement issued by U.S. President George Washington on April 22, 1793 that declared the nation neutral in the conflict between France and Great Britain. It threatened legal proceedings against any American providing assistance to any country at war.

When war broke out in Europe, the United States immediately declared its neutrality. President Woodrow Wilson stated that America must be “impartial in thought as well as in action.” For a century, the U.S. had stayed out of European affairs. Most Americans preferred to continue this policy.

After a fierce debate in Congress, in November of 1939, a final Neutrality Act passed.

5 0
3 years ago
What effect did the printing press have on the number of books produced and their selling price?
Ivanshal [37]
More books were produced more rapidly because they no longer had to be copied by hand, which lowered the price and made them more accessible.
6 0
3 years ago
Given what you know about the geography and chronology of the Chavin and Nazca, what might explain the fact that the Chavin and
MaRussiya [10]

What might explain the fact that the Chavin and Nazca use underground aqueducts to transport water is that Chavin's technology likely influenced the later Nazca.

The ancient Chavin civilization was a pre-Inca civilization that arose in Peru in the year 1500 BC to 300 BC. Its economy was based on gathering, hunting, fishing and agriculture.

The Chavin people's underground aqueducts were developed as a hydraulic technique to improve agricultural practice.

The Nazca were an ancient civilization that developed in Peru around 100 BC. As a highlight, we can mention the mathematical and architectural knowledge of this people, who built great religious temples.

The Nazca economy was also based on agriculture, and they developed the system of underground aqueducts to transport water as a direct influence of the Chavin culture, which was the civilization prior to the Nazca civilization.

Therefore, the correct alternative is:

  • The technology of the Chavin likely influenced the later Nazca.

Learn more about Nazca here:

brainly.com/question/1580196

8 0
3 years ago
Which group in Hawaii was in favor of annexation by the United States?
REY [17]

Answer:

A. Ordinary Hawaiians

<h2>Who encouraged the annexation of Hawaii and why?</h2>

There is a complicated history behind the United States of America's eventual conquest of Hawaii. One that a little letter simply cannot do credit to. I will only briefly touch on some of the most significant incidents and overarching ideas.

One may start in 1851, when the French were mistreating the Hawaiian government once more and there was genuine danger that they would spiral out of control. Hawaii attempted to give sovereignty to the British as a result, but they showed little interest. They then came close to the USA. They signed a document transferring sovereignty to the United States in the event of war. But there was never a necessity (and it is unlikely that America was any more interested in being responsible for that faraway place than The United Kingdom was).

However, compared to other foreign states, Hawaii garnered more commercial and social attention from America. The problem of annexation became more pressing as trade links deepened over time. In the late 1860s and early 1870s the desire for a treaty of reciprocity for trade became so great that it was considered a matter of reciprocity or annexation.

Kalkaua was chosen as king by the Hawaiian legislature in 1874. This was mostly brought on by the mischief (er, influence) of regional American interests. They worried that Queen Emma, a popular figure and the widow of a past monarch, was too pro-British. He oversaw the signing of the reciprocity pact. It also gave America some access to the perhaps significant Pearl Harbor.

However, King Kalkaua had his own ideas about how to rule and resented the limitations that others tried to impose on him. He distinctly lost the support of the majority of Hawaii's "foreign" population. Since they were of foreign descent—in many cases, they were Hawaii citizens—we have put the word in quotation marks. The Kalkaua government was not just a nuisance, but also mocked for its various scandals. Many of them were due to the king’s attempting to acquire funds to promote his interests, private and public.

In 1887, everything came to a head. American citizens and those of American ancestry in particular staged a blatant uprising, forcing the monarch to sign a new constitution that, incidentally, severely curtailed the right to vote (those who qualified to vote). There were other famous organizers, including Lorrin A. Thurston.

Around this period, the American government started to take a more expansionist stance. James G. Blaine was appointed Secretary of State by the Harrison administration in 1889. He and John L. Stevens, his choice to serve as Hawaii's diplomatic ambassador, had a strong ambition to annex the islands to the United States. In addition, things started to move in Hawaii. The Annexation Club, a covert group, was created. Ostensibly not to precipitate annexation, but only to be ready if the need arose… In 1893, it did really arise.

Queen Liliuokalani, the monarch of Hawaii, aimed to impose a new constitution (essentially undoing the restrictions imposed in 1887). The anti-monarchical forces mobilized as a result, and the queen was overthrown. Even if he wasn't actively involved in the overthrow in this case, Minister Stevens was undoubtedly "dirty." He was in close communication with the leading revolutionaries, quickly recognized the new administration, and ordered American forces to land (as a "precaution"). The troops did little more than remain in their camp on the coast, but it was evident that their presence intimidated the overthrown administration.

Of course, the Provisional Government was eager for quick annexation by the United States (as suggested by its name). Sadly, Grover Cleveland had recently beaten Benjamin Harrison, and the new American administration was not interested in supporting them. In fact, they gave the monarchy some serious thought! But annexation had to wait till Hawaii was taken in with the spoils of the Spanish-American War because it was not to be.

Thank you,

Eddie

8 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • What conclusion can you make about Municipal Courts in Georgia?
    14·1 answer
  • Potato crops in Idaho have been damaged by plant disease, causing a scarcity of potatoes in the market. What is the most likely
    6·2 answers
  • How does the nato and the warsaw pact affect the soviet union?
    6·1 answer
  • How did the incidents in Colfax, Memphis lead to the Reconstruction of Civil Rights amendments?
    8·1 answer
  • What happened to Russia's role in World War I after the Bolsheviks took control of Russia? Question 10 options: A) Russia defeat
    14·1 answer
  • The compromise of 1877 signaled an end to
    15·2 answers
  • Why did the allies propose a “Europe first” strategy
    6·1 answer
  • How did the proclamation of 1763 attempt to protect native American rights and land
    9·1 answer
  • Hitler was the leader of the Nazi party and he named himself what of Germany
    7·1 answer
  • What are two views that Americans have of the cause of the Civil War?​
    13·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!