Answer:
social environment such as our peer group and teachers and other circumstances such as the availability of facilities.
Explanation:
If your peer group re the one that involve in so much sedentary lifestyles such as playing video games and online social interactions, you are likely going to follow that pattern. This is because as we grow older, the influence of social groups on our behavior becomes intense.
Most athletes who started their career from their school systems have remarked that their coaches and personal trainers influenced their participation at those sporting activities. They have such influence because they are in the position to confirm ones competence in the games and that either makes us more interested in the activities or make our interests wane.
also, the availability of play spaces can determine the amount of activities we can engage in.
<span>MacDonaldization was first described by sociologist George Ritzer at the University of Maryland. He used Max Weber's classic theory about bureaucracy as his jumping off point.
Weber, a nineteenth and early twentieth century German sociologist, said that bureaucracy would be the "wave of the future." Bureaucratic methods reduced every operation to its constituent parts and then had workers specifically trained to do just that one job. In a sense, this put an end to "old world craftsmanship," and was compatible with assembly-line methods of the new factory system.
He used the MacDonald fast food chain as a metaphor. Every MacDonalds in the world operates exactly the same way. French fries are cut uniformly. No one has to decide when they are "done" in the fryer. That has been computed and programmed into the frying machine. Therefore, the fries always come out exactly the same.
Each step in the preparation of the meal is done the same way. Consequently, the Big Mac that you buy in Tokyo tastes exactly the same as one you might buy in Rio de Janeiro or New York City.
MacDonaldization emphasizes uniformity, redundancy, reductionism, and familiarity. Weber, incidentally, liked some of the qualities of bureaucratization, but he warned that -- if it were not closely watched -- it could run amok. This is, essentially, what Ritzer means by MacDonaldization.
. </span>
Answer:
The progressive constitution granted universal suffrage, stripped Emperor Hirohito of all but symbolic power, stipulated a bill of rights, abolished peerage, and outlawed Japan's right to make war.
Explanation:
Answer:
Gibbons v. Ogden.
Explanation:
Gibbons v. Ogden was a landmark decision in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that the power to regulate interstate commerce, granted to Congress by the Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution, encompassed the power to regulate navigation.
Answer:
Ever since from its inception, the constitution of the United States has intended to protect a wide set of civil rights and civil liberties. The Bill of Rights was ratified in 1791, only four years after the US Constitution became effective. Among the civil rights protected are: freedom of speech, freedom of assembly, right to a fair trial and freedom of religion.
Civil rights have expanded throught american history, and it can be argued that they are far more protected in the 21th century, than they were in the 19th or early 20th century. Perhaps, the greatest expansion came from the civil rights movement of the 1960s, which sought to broaden the rights of African Americans and other minorities.
African Americans did not enjoy the same rights as white americans for most of american history, even if this difference violated the Constitution. The end of segregation, and the fight against many forms of discrimination that resulted from the civil rights movement have helped immensely to protect this minority group.
However, some civil rights have been infriged in recent decades. For example, the right to privacy by the NSA.
In conclusion, there is a clear advancement in the protection of civil rights, but there are still plenty of obstacles and setbacks. It is a citizen duty to be vigilant of possible restrictions on liberty.
