Answer:
The principle in Law 'Nemo dat quod non habet' states that an individual connot give what he does not have
Indeed Tom can rescind the contract with Matthew as he possesses voidable title to the balls
Explanation:
Until consideration has moved from Matthew to Tom the validity of the agreement/Contract remains inconclusive.
Considering his Account is not funded means he has no valid title to the Balls, he is merely in possession of the Balls but not the Owner.
Tom can sue demanding a return of the Balls irrespective of Matthew having sold them to Aaron.
Another illustration could be given of a thief who sells off a property. Inspite of the Buyer being unaware, because the thief has a voidable title it makes the transaction invalid.
I think it could possibly be d?
Answer :It doesn't allow the entrepreneur to raise enough money. -A.
The normative economic analysis involves <u>value judgments and opinions.</u>
<h3><u>By normative economic analysis, what do you mean?</u></h3>
Normative economics is an approach to the study of economics that expresses normative or ideologically prescriptive judgments on economic development, investment initiatives, claims, and scenarios.
Normative economics is heavily concerned with value judgments and declarations of "what ought to be" rather than facts based on cause-and-effect statements, in contrast to positive economics, which is dependent on objective data analysis. It reflects ideological opinions regarding potential outcomes for economic activity in the event that public policy changes. It is impossible to verify or validate normative economic claims.
Learn more about normative economics with the help of the given link:
brainly.com/question/17352984
#SPJ4
$900,000
Depreciation for the year $600,000
Employee bonuses $1,200,000
Total expenses for the year 1,800,000
Expenses to be reported in interim income statement 1,800,000=$900,000
