Step-by-step explanation:
Length= 8m
Surface area = ?
Now ,

= 6 × 8 × 8
= 6 × 64

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:
So we have the equation:
. and I'm assuming you meant to do mixed fractions and not actually multiplying. 2 * 2/3. So the first thing to do is follow PEMDAS which essentially says Parenthesis first, Exponents next, Multiplication or Division, and then Addition or Subtract. So let's start by evaluating the 2 2/3 and 1 1/2. The first step is to combine 2 into the 2/3 and the 1 into 1/2. This is done by multiplying the 2 by the denominator of 3, and adding it to the numerator so:
. And you do this for the 1/2 as well:
.
Now when adding fractions, you can only add them when they have the same denominator, so we have the get 3/2 and 8/3 to have the same denominator. You can list the multiplies of 2 and 3 to try to find a LCM, but in this case, I'll just multiply 2 and 3, since they're really small numbers, also because 6 is the LCM.
. And now do this to the 3/2 you get:
. Now the inside of the parenthesis is:
. So now we have the equation:
. Also notice how I got ride of the plus sign and made it negative? Think of it as having a 1 in front and simply distributing that to the -7, 1*(-7) becomes -7.
Now to multiply the fraction by a whole number you simply multiply the denominator and numerator, and you can think of the denominator of a whole number as a 1. So this gives you:
. Now we have the equation:
. And to subtract these two numbers I'll make the 3 1/2 a fraction by multiplying the 3 by the denominator and adding it to the 1 which should become 7/2. And after that multiply both sides by 3/3 to get 21/6 so they have the same denominator. This gives you the equation:
. Which can simplify by dividing both sides by 2 to get: 
Using error concepts, it is found that in this problem, a type I error would be finding an innocent person guilty, while a type II error would be finding a guilty person innocent.
<h3>What are Type I and Type II errors?</h3>
- Type I: Rejection of a true null hypothesis. The null hypothesis is true, but from a sample, you get enough evidence to reject.
- Type II: Non-rejection of a false null hypothesis. The null hypothesis is false, but from a sample, you do not get enough evidence to reject.
Hence:
In this problem, a type I error would be finding an innocent person guilty, while a type II error would be finding a guilty person innocent.
More can be learned about error concepts at brainly.com/question/25225353
Answer:
Adriana took care of 20 kids. And Brandy took care of 12 kids.
Step-by-step explanation:
Here,
Let us suppose Adriana took care of "x" number of children after school.
Then, by the question,
Brandy took care of 0.6 times as many children as adriana.
i.e. Brandy took care of =0.6*x children
So,
Total no. of children that they took care of is = 
=
The data given says they took care of 32 children,
so,

or,
∴
So, Adriana took care of 20 kids. And Brandy took care of (=0.6*20)=12 kids.